Literature DB >> 16617244

How does the mode of inheritance of a genetic condition influence families? A study of guilt, blame, stigma, and understanding of inheritance and reproductive risks in families with X-linked and autosomal recessive diseases.

Cynthia A James1, Donald W Hadley, Neil A Holtzman, Jerry A Winkelstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While the mode of inheritance of a genetic condition has long been considered to have not only medical, but also psychosocial consequences for families, this supposition has never been tested.
METHODS: We surveyed 112 members of 51 families (59% response) with chronic granulomatous disease to determine the influence of mode of inheritance on parents', siblings', and patients' (1) knowledge of inheritance and reproductive risk; (2) concern about risk to future family-members; (3) feelings of guilt and blame; and (4) feelings of stigmatization. Ninety-six members of 51 families (49% response) with Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy types II/III were also studied.
RESULTS: X-linked families had better understanding of inheritance (P < 0.001) and reproductive risks (P < 0.01). X-linked mothers worried more about risks to future generations; other autosomal-recessive family members were as worried. X-linked mothers were more likely to feel guilty (P < 0.01) and blame themselves (P < 0.001). X-linked fathers blamed their child's mother (P < 0.05) and X-linked mothers felt more blamed by the father (P < 0.01). X-linked family-members were more likely to consider being a carrier stigmatizing (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: When providing genetic counseling, attention should be given to guilt and blame in X-linked families and understanding reproductive risks in autosomal recessive families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16617244     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000215177.28010.6e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  31 in total

Review 1.  Can we make assumptions about the psychosocial impact of living as a carrier, based on studies assessing the effects of carrier testing?

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Heather Skirton; Ray Jones
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Extended family impact of genetic testing: the experiences of X-linked carrier grandmothers.

Authors:  Anna Lehmann; Beverley S Speight; Lauren Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C): a review of molecular and clinical literature.

Authors:  Brittney Murray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Risk of Cardiac Events Associated With Antidepressant Therapy in Patients With Long QT Syndrome.

Authors:  Meng Wang; Barbara Szepietowska; Bronislava Polonsky; Scott McNitt; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; David S Auerbach
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Psychosocial Responses to being Identified as a Balanced Chromosomal Translocation Carrier: a Qualitative Investigation of Parents in Japan.

Authors:  Mikiko Kaneko; Hirofumi Ohashi; Tomoko Takamura; Hiroshi Kawame
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Women's attitudes toward testing for fragile X carrier status: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Aimee Anido; Lisa M Carlson; Lisa Taft; Stephanie L Sherman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Perceptions of parents of children with hearing loss of genetic origin in South Africa.

Authors:  Sinead Amber Gardiner; Nakita Laing; Sumaya Mall; Ambroise Wonkam
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-11-21

Review 8.  Maternal uniparental isodisomy causing autosomal recessive GM1 gangliosidosis: a clinical report.

Authors:  Jessica E King; Amy Dexter; Inder Gadi; Val Zvereff; Meaghan Martin; Miriam Bloom; Adeline Vanderver; Amy Pizzino; Johanna L Schmidt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  The role of current affect, anticipated affect and spontaneous self-affirmation in decisions to receive self-threatening genetic risk information.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Peter R Harris; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Non-syndromic sensorineural prelingual deafness: the importance of genetic counseling in demystifying parents' beliefs about the cause of their children's deafness.

Authors:  Fidjy Rodrigues; Milena Paneque; Cláudia Reis; Margarida Venâncio; Jorge Sequeiros; Jorge Saraiva
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.