Literature DB >> 16617063

Azithromycin iv pharmacodynamic parameters predicting Streptococcus pneumoniae killing in epithelial lining fluid versus serum: an in vitro pharmacodynamic simulation.

David Sevillano1, Luis Alou, Lorenzo Aguilar, Olatz Echevarría, María-José Giménez, José Prieto.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the azithromycin pharmacodynamic parameters predicting bacterial killing in epithelial lining fluid (ELF) versus serum against macrolide-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates (with different resistance genotypes), through the simulation of concentrations achieved after a 500 mg intravenous (iv) once a day regimen.
METHODS: An in vitro computer-controlled pharmacodynamic simulation of human azithromycin concentrations in serum and ELF was carried out, and colony counts were determined over 24 h. Four strains with MIC values (mg/L) of 0.5 [mef(A) and erm(B) negative], 2 [mef(A) positive and erm(B) negative], 8 [mef(A) positive and erm(B) negative] and 256 [mef(A) negative and erm(B) positive] were used.
RESULTS: Significant (P < 0.05) azithromycin antibacterial activity versus antibiotic-free controls was found in serum and ELF against the susceptible and mef(A) positive strains, but not against the erm(B) positive strain. AUC(0-24)/MIC values around or higher than 25 were needed to achieve (time to 99.9% reduction of initial inocula of around 6 h) and maintain (24 h inocula reduction > or =3 log(10)cfu/mL) bactericidal activity without regrowth. This was achieved only with the susceptible strain in serum, but also with the mef(A) positive strain exhibiting an MIC of 2 mg/L in ELF.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support that the suggested breakpoint for susceptibility (< or =2 mg/L) may be adequate to predict S. pneumoniae eradication with ELF but not with serum concentrations obtained after a 500 mg iv once a day regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16617063     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

Review 1.  Penetration of anti-infective agents into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid: focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Keith A Rodvold; Jomy M George; Liz Yoo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  In vitro evaluation of polyethylene glycol based microparticles containing azithromycin.

Authors:  Shunmugaperumal Tamilvanan; Vinay Kumar; Deepak Sharma; Ashutosh Thakur
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  The fitness cost of antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: insight from the field.

Authors:  M Cyrus Maher; Wondu Alemayehu; Takele Lakew; Bruce D Gaynor; Sara Haug; Vicky Cevallos; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman; Travis C Porco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Azithromycin novel drug delivery system for ocular application.

Authors:  Ritu Mehra Gilhotra; Kalpana Nagpal; Dina Nath Mishra
Journal:  Int J Pharm Investig       Date:  2011-01

5.  Unveiling the Synergistic Interaction Between Liposomal Amphotericin B and Colistin.

Authors:  Rita Teixeira-Santos; Elisabete Ricardo; Ricardo J Branco; Maria M Azevedo; Acácio G Rodrigues; Cidália Pina-Vaz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Predicting Antimicrobial Activity at the Target Site: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Indices versus Time-Kill Approaches.

Authors:  Wisse van Os; Markus Zeitlinger
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.