Literature DB >> 16616817

Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons.

Olga F Lazareva1, Kate L Freiburger, Edward A Wasserman.   

Abstract

Four pigeons were previously trained [Lazareva, O.F., Freiburger, K.L., Wasserman, E.A., 2004. Pigeons concurrently categorize photographs at both basic and superordinate levels. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 1111-1117] to classify color photographs into either their proper basic-level category (cars, chairs, flowers, or people) or a superordinate-level category (nominally natural or artificial). In Experiment 1, the same pigeons were shown either reflected or inverted versions of the training stimuli. Reflection had no effect on pigeons' classification behavior, whereas inversion impaired discrimination of all stimulus categories, except flowers, on the basic-level and superordinate-level tasks. Pixel matching analysis revealed that pattern matching played at most a minor role in the birds' categorization behavior. In Experiment 2, the pigeons were shown test stimuli that were either blurred or quartered and scrambled. Blurring impaired discrimination of cars, but had no effect on discrimination of people and flowers; scrambling impaired discrimination of people and flowers leaving discrimination of cars and chairs unaffected. These results suggest that categorization of flowers and people may be controlled primarily by the overall shape of the object rather than by local features, whereas categorization of cars and chairs may rely primarily on local features rather than the overall shape of the object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16616817     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  5 in total

1.  Dominant vertical orientation processing without clustered maps: early visual brain dynamics imaged with voltage-sensitive dye in the pigeon visual Wulst.

Authors:  Benedict Shien Wei Ng; Agnieszka Grabska-Barwińska; Onur Güntürkün; Dirk Jancke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Error-driven learning in visual categorization and object recognition: a common-elements model.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Effects of stimulus duration and choice delay on visual categorization in pigeons.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2009-05-01

4.  Categorization of birds, mammals, and chimeras by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Anthony A Wright; Eric E Drachman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Mechanisms of object recognition: what we have learned from pigeons.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.