Literature DB >> 16616408

Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a comparative study.

Edi Vaisbuch1, Chen Goldchmit, Dganit Ofer, Arnon Agmon, Zion Hagay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study of 167 women who had laparoscopic hysterectomy and 119 women who had total abdominal hysterectomy. For assessing the learning curve, the laparoscopic hysterectomies were further subdivided to the first 30 hysterectomies and the later hysterectomies. For data analysis Student's t-test, chi2-test and Fisher's exact test were used.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups for age, body mass index, previous abdominal surgery, uterine weight, first postoperative day hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion and major or minor complications rate. Operation time was significantly longer for laparoscopic than abdominal hysterectomy (156+/-40 and 91.2+/-33 min, respectively; P<0.001) but the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter (3.9 and 6.55 days, respectively; P<0.001). The conversion rate of laparoscopic hysterectomy was 1.8% (three cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hysterectomy can be safely done even during the learning curve with a low and reasonable complication rate, and a shorter hospital stay but with longer operation time. As experience is gained the operation time, complication rate and hospital stay are decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16616408     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Postoperative readmissions following laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a comparison.

Authors:  John P Judd; Kenneth Byrd; Mark Jiang
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2007

2.  Complications with laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy: multivariate analysis of 300 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jong-Min Park; Sung-Ho Jin; Sang-Rim Lee; Hong Kim; In Ho Jung; Yong Kwan Cho; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy via suture and ligation technique.

Authors:  Hye Won Kang; Ji Won Lee; Ho Yeon Kim; Bo Wook Kim; Chong Soo Moon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-01-15

Review 4.  A network meta-analysis of comparison of operative time and complications of laparoscopy, laparotomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Ya-Ru Wang; Hui-Fang Lu; Hui-Can Huo; Chang-Ping Qu; Gui-Xia Sun; Shi-Qing Shao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Assessing the learning curve for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ali Ghomi; Paul Littman; Aru Prasad; Jon Ivar Einarsson
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy in the Treatment of High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Huiqiao Gao; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.