Literature DB >> 16615387

How bad is a 10% chance of losing a toe? Judgments of probabilistic conditions by doctors and laypeople.

Andrea Gurmankin Levy1, Jonathan Baron.   

Abstract

We presented a Web questionnaire to 139 physicians and medical researchers and 109 laypeople. The subjects made judgments of badness and importance of prevention for eight medical conditions at each of seven different probability levels. By assuming that the response to each of the 56 risks was monotonically related to transformations of the probability and of the disutility of the condition, we could assess the relative effect of probability and disutility on each subject's judgments. Physicians' judgments were more sensitive than laypeople's judgments to changes in probability. Older and female laypeople were less sensitive to probability (and correspondingly, more responsive to differences in severity among medical conditions). Laypeople varied more than physicians in their responsiveness to probability. These results point to general individual differences in the effect of probability on evaluations of medical risks. They may also provide insight into causes and noncauses of physician-patient miscommunication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16615387     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  4 in total

1.  Teaching reasoning.

Authors:  R E Nisbett; G T Fong; D R Lehman; P W Cheng
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Patients' resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for BRCA1/2.

Authors:  Andrea D Gurmankin; Susan Domchek; Jill Stopfer; Christina Fels; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-14

3.  Racial differences in how patients perceive physician communication regarding cardiac testing.

Authors:  Tracie C Collins; Jack A Clark; Laura A Petersen; Nancy R Kressin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Intended message versus message received in hypothetical physician risk communications: exploring the gap.

Authors:  Andrea D Gurmankin; Jonathan Baron; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.000

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  TOWARDS PATIENT-CENTERED CARE FOR DEPRESSION: CONJOINT METHODS TO TAILOR TREATMENT BASED ON PREFERENCES.

Authors:  Marsha N Wittink; Mark Cary; Thomas Tenhave; Jonathan Baron; Joseph J Gallo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  fMRI evidence of a hot-cold empathy gap in hypothetical and real aversive choices.

Authors:  Min J Kang; Colin F Camerer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  The neural basis of risky choice with affective outcomes.

Authors:  Renata S Suter; Thorsten Pachur; Ralph Hertwig; Tor Endestad; Guido Biele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Understanding clinical and non-clinical decisions under uncertainty: a scenario-based survey.

Authors:  Vlad V Simianu; Margaret A Grounds; Susan L Joslyn; Jared E LeClerc; Anne P Ehlers; Nidhi Agrawal; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Abraham D Flaxman; David R Flum
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.