Literature DB >> 16615334

Evidence for a modality effect in sentence retention.

Ralf Rummer1, Judith Schweppe.   

Abstract

It is well known that an acoustic-sensory code supports retention of linguistic materials whose storage is particularly based on phonological information (e.g., unrelated word lists). The present study investigates whether such a code also contributes to the retention of sentences. It has been shown that short-term sentence recall particularly depends on propositional and lexicosemantic information, which are assumed to be supplied independently of modality influences. We employed the intrusion paradigm of Potter and Lombardi (1990) and manipulated the availability of acoustic-sensory information. Participants were instructed to read sentences either silently or aloud. Since these two reading conditions also differ with respect to articulatory information, a further condition that provided articulatory but not acoustic-sensory information was introduced (i.e., silent mouthing). Our data suggest that acoustic-sensory information is used, if available, even in sentence recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16615334     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  Short-term sentence recall: evidence for the contribution of acoustic-sensory information.

Authors:  Ralf Rummer; Johannes Engelkamp
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-09

2.  On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: separating input and output factors.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; J Scott Saults; Gordon D A Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.

Authors:  C G Penney
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

4.  Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.

Authors:  D A Balota; N Cowan; R W Engle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Prefix effects in immediate memory.

Authors:  R G Crowder
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1967-10
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Distinct Neural Processes for Memorizing Form and Meaning Within Sentences.

Authors:  Matteo Mascelloni; Roberto Zamparelli; Francesco Vespignani; Thomas Gruber; Jutta L Mueller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.