Literature DB >> 16614426

Urinary potassium is as reliable as urinary nitrogen for use as a recovery biomarker in dietary studies of free living individuals.

Natasa Tasevska1, Shirley A Runswick, Sheila A Bingham.   

Abstract

Twenty-four-hour urinary nitrogen (UN) is commonly used to validate dietary assessment methods. Potassium is more widespread in food than nitrogen, but the role of 24-h urinary potassium (UK) as a biomarker has been less studied and characterized. To investigate the performance of UK as a recovery biomarker compared with UN in subjects consuming their normal diet, 7 males and 6 females consumed known amounts of food based on their habitual varying diet (assessed beforehand from 4 consecutive 7-d food diaries) for 30 d in a metabolic suite. All daily urine samples and dietary duplicates were collected, and N and K were measured. Stool K was determined in 5-d pooled samples. Thirty-day mean analyzed K intake was 121.3 +/- 25.1 (mean +/- SD) mmol/d. Overall, 77 +/- 6.7% of K in the diet was excreted in urine and 18 +/- 5% in stool. Dietary K was correlated with UK (r = 0.89; P < 0.001). UN was 77.7 +/- 6.6% of N intake and was correlated with N in the diet (r = 0.87; P < 0.001). When 16 d of intake and 8 d of urine-collection measurements were randomly selected from the 30-d measurements, correlations were significant for both K (r = 0.86; P < 0.001) and N (r = 0.92; P < 0.001). The high correlations between UK and K in the diet show that UK is a reliable recovery biomarker for use in studies of dietary measurement error. Factors for use of urinary N as a recovery biomarker are also confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16614426     DOI: 10.1093/jn/136.5.1334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  32 in total

1.  Bias in protein and potassium intake collected with 24-h recalls (EPIC-Soft) is rather comparable across European populations.

Authors:  Sandra P Crispim; Anouk Geelen; Jeanne H M de Vries; Heinz Freisling; Olga W Souverein; Paul J M Hulshof; Marga C Ocke; Hendriek Boshuizen; Lene F Andersen; Jiri Ruprich; Willem De Keyzer; Willem De Keizer; Inge Huybrechts; Lionel Lafay; Maria S de Magistris; Fulvio Ricceri; Rosario Tumino; Vittorio Krogh; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Joline W J Beulens; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Androniki Naska; Francesca L Crowe; Heiner Boeing; Alison McTaggart; Rudolf Kaaks; Pieter Van't Veer; Nadia Slimani
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Using regression calibration equations that combine self-reported intake and biomarker measures to obtain unbiased estimates and more powerful tests of dietary associations.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Nataŝa Tasevska; Arthur Schatzkin; Julie Mares; Lesley Tinker; Nancy Potischman; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Difference between 24-h diet recall and urine excretion for assessing population sodium and potassium intake in adults aged 18-39 y.

Authors:  Carla I Mercado; Mary E Cogswell; Amy L Valderrama; Chia-Yih Wang; Catherine M Loria; Alanna J Moshfegh; Donna G Rhodes; Alicia L Carriquiry
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Reproducibility of urinary biomarkers in multiple 24-h urine samples.

Authors:  Qi Sun; Kimberly A Bertrand; Adrian A Franke; Bernard Rosner; Gary C Curhan; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Evaluation of measurement error in 24-hour dietary recall for assessing sodium and potassium intake among US adults - National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2014.

Authors:  Puthiery Va; Kevin W Dodd; Lixia Zhao; Angela M Thompson-Paul; Carla I Mercado; Ana L Terry; Sandra L Jackson; Chia-Yih Wang; Catherine M Loria; Alanna J Moshfegh; Donna G Rhodes; Mary E Cogswell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Revised Reference Values for Potassium Intake.

Authors:  Daniela Strohm; Sabine Ellinger; Eva Leschik-Bonnet; Friederike Maretzke; Helmut Heseker
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.374

7.  Estimated net endogenous acid production and serum bicarbonate in African Americans with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Julia J Scialla; Lawrence J Appel; Brad C Astor; Edgar R Miller; Srinivasan Beddhu; Mark Woodward; Rulan S Parekh; Cheryl A M Anderson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for potassium and sodium intake.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; John M Commins; James E Moler; Walter Willett; Lesley F Tinker; Amy F Subar; Donna Spiegelman; Donna Rhodes; Nancy Potischman; Marian L Neuhouser; Alanna J Moshfegh; Victor Kipnis; Lenore Arab; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Nutriome-metabolome relationships provide insights into dietary intake and metabolism.

Authors:  Joram M Posma; Isabel Garcia-Perez; Gary Frost; Ghadeer S Aljuraiban; Queenie Chan; Linda Van Horn; Martha Daviglus; Jeremiah Stamler; Elaine Holmes; Paul Elliott; Jeremy K Nicholson
Journal:  Nat Food       Date:  2020-06-22

10.  The effects of high potassium consumption on bone mineral density in a prospective cohort study of elderly postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Zhu; A Devine; R L Prince
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.