Literature DB >> 16614122

The effect of medicare health care delivery systems on survival for patients with breast and colorectal cancer.

Robert S Kirsner1, Fangchao Ma, Lora Fleming, Daniel G Federman, Edward Trapido, Robert Duncan, James D Wilkinson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two of the most common types of health care delivery systems in the U.S. are fee-for-service (FFS) and managed care systems such as health maintenance organizations (HMO). Differences may exist in patient outcomes depending on the health care delivery system in which they are enrolled. We evaluated differences in the survival of patients with breast and colorectal cancer at diagnosis between the two Medicare health care delivery systems (FFS and HMO).
METHODS: We used a linkage of two national databases, the Medicare database from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database, to evaluate differences in demographic data, stage at diagnosis, and survival between breast and colorectal cancer over the period 1985 to 2001.
RESULTS: Medicare patients enrolled in HMOs were diagnosed at an earlier stage of diagnosis than FFS patients. HMO patients diagnosed with breast and colorectal cancer had improved survival, and these differences remained even after controlling for potential confounders (such as stage at diagnosis, age, race, socioeconomic status, and marital status). Specifically, patients enrolled in HMOs had 9% greater survival in hazards ratio if they had breast cancer, and 6% if they had colorectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist in survival among patients in HMOs compared with FFS. This is likely due to a combination of factors, including but not limited to, earlier stage at the time of diagnoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16614122     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  6 in total

1.  The challenge of conducting comparative effectiveness research in cancer: the impact of a fragmented U.S. health-care system.

Authors:  Paul A Fishman; Mark C Hornbrook; Debra P Ritzwoller; Maureen C O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Ramzi G Salloum
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

2.  The influence of comorbidities on overall survival among older women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer L Patnaik; Tim Byers; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Thomas D Denberg; Dana Dabelea
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Managed care and cancer outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries with disabilities.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Thomas N Chirikos; Kristen J Wells; Ellen P McCarthy; Long H Ngo; Donglin Li; Reed E Drews; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Previous cancer screening behavior as predictor of endoscopic colon cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, in NYC 2002.

Authors:  Rafael Guerrero-Preston; Christina Chan; David Vlahov; Maria K Mitchell; Stephen B Johnson; Harold Freeman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-02

5.  Cardiovascular disease competes with breast cancer as the leading cause of death for older females diagnosed with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Patnaik; Tim Byers; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Dana Dabelea; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Comparison of Survival among Colon Cancer Patients in the U.S. Military Health System and Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program.

Authors:  Jie Lin; Katherine A McGlynn; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.090

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.