L Lüdemann1, W Grieger, R Wurm, P Wust, C Zimmer. 1. Department of Neuroradiology and Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Berlin, Germany. lutz.luedemann@charite.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the use of blood volume maps in the non-invasive separation of glioma grades. MATERIAL AND METHODS: T1-weighted quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify the fractional intratumoral blood volume of 41 gliomas (World Health Organization (WHO) grades II-IV). Two methods, mean fractional intratumoral blood volume determination and a system based on thresholds for extracting the tumor pixels with the highest vascularization from the blood volume maps, were investigated by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The thresholds were adjusted using the ROC curve area calculated using the trapezoid method. RESULTS: The ability to separate grade II (WHO) gliomas from grades III-IV was nearly the same for both methods (ROC curve area 0.941 (threshold) versus 0.932 (mean value)) and significantly greater than the ability to separate grade IV (WHO) gliomas from grades II-III (ROC curve area 0.792 (threshold) versus 0.787 (mean value)). The best correspondence with WHO glioma grading was achieved using thresholds corresponding to only the 5.2% of tumor voxels with the largest blood volume for separating grade II gliomas and 4% for separating grade IV gliomas. CONCLUSION: Use of the optimized threshold resulted in matching with the WHO grading system in 74% of cases.
PURPOSE: To investigate the use of blood volume maps in the non-invasive separation of glioma grades. MATERIAL AND METHODS: T1-weighted quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was used to quantify the fractional intratumoral blood volume of 41 gliomas (World Health Organization (WHO) grades II-IV). Two methods, mean fractional intratumoral blood volume determination and a system based on thresholds for extracting the tumor pixels with the highest vascularization from the blood volume maps, were investigated by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The thresholds were adjusted using the ROC curve area calculated using the trapezoid method. RESULTS: The ability to separate grade II (WHO) gliomas from grades III-IV was nearly the same for both methods (ROC curve area 0.941 (threshold) versus 0.932 (mean value)) and significantly greater than the ability to separate grade IV (WHO) gliomas from grades II-III (ROC curve area 0.792 (threshold) versus 0.787 (mean value)). The best correspondence with WHO glioma grading was achieved using thresholds corresponding to only the 5.2% of tumor voxels with the largest blood volume for separating grade II gliomas and 4% for separating grade IV gliomas. CONCLUSION: Use of the optimized threshold resulted in matching with the WHO grading system in 74% of cases.
Authors: Adriana Tomic; Ivan Tomic; Yael Rosenberg-Hasson; Cornelia L Dekker; Holden T Maecker; Mark M Davis Journal: J Immunol Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Ruihuan Chai; Min Liao; Ling Ou; Qian Tang; Youfang Liang; Nan Li; Wei Huang; Xiao Wang; Kai Zheng; Shaoxiang Wang Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 3.246
Authors: Riham H El Khouli; Katarzyna J Macura; Peter B Barker; Mohamed R Habba; Michael A Jacobs; David A Bluemke Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jason M Zimmerer; Matthew W Basinger; Bryce A Ringwald; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Ronald P Pelletier; Amer Rajab; Ashraf El-Hinnawi; Hemant Parekh; Kenneth Washburn; Ginny L Bumgardner Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 5.385
Authors: Anika Sauerbrey; Stefan Hindel; Marc Maaß; Christine Krüger; Andreas Wissmann; Martin Kramer; Benno Nafz; Lutz Lüdemann Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Stefan Hindel; Anika Söhner; Marc Maaß; Wolfgang Sauerwein; Dorothe Möllmann; Hideo Andreas Baba; Martin Kramer; Lutz Lüdemann Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Neuza Silva; Monika Bullinger; Helena Moreira; Maria Cristina Canavarro; Carlos Carona Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hans Timmerman; Monique A H Steegers; Frank J P M Huygen; Jelle J Goeman; Nick T van Dasselaar; Marcel J Schenkels; Oliver H G Wilder-Smith; André P Wolff; Kris C P Vissers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240