Literature DB >> 16612632

How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task.

Nicholas J Mulcahy1, Josep Call.   

Abstract

To date, neither primates nor birds have shown clear evidence of causal knowledge when attempting to solve the trap tube task. One factor that may have contributed to mask the knowledge that subjects may have about the task is that subjects were only allowed to push the reward away from them, which is a particularly difficult action for primates in certain problem solving situations. We presented five orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), two chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), two bonobos (Pan paniscus), and one gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) with a modified trap tube that allowed subjects to push or rake the reward with the tool. In two additional follow-up tests, we inverted the tube 180 degrees rendering the trap nonfunctional and also presented subjects with the original task in which they were required to push the reward out of the tube. Results showed that all but one of the subjects preferred to rake the reward. Two orangutans and one chimpanzee (all of whom preferred to rake the reward), consistently avoided the trap only when it was functional but failed the original task. These findings suggest that some great apes may have some causal knowledge about the trap-tube task. Their success, however, depended on whether they were allowed to choose certain tool-using actions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612632     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-006-0019-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  25 in total

1.  Do new caledonian crows solve physical problems through causal reasoning?

Authors:  A H Taylor; G R Hunt; F S Medina; R D Gray
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Causal reasoning in New Caledonian crows: Ruling out spatial analogies and sampling error.

Authors:  Alex Taylor; Reece Roberts; Gavin Hunt; Russell Gray
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009-07

3.  The power of possibility: causal learning, counterfactual reasoning, and pretend play.

Authors:  Daphna Buchsbaum; Sophie Bridgers; Deena Skolnick Weisberg; Alison Gopnik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) can learn to attend to connectivity in string pulling tasks.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Corsin Müller; Friederike Range; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  The representation of tool use in humans and monkeys: common and uniquely human features.

Authors:  R Peeters; L Simone; K Nelissen; M Fabbri-Destro; W Vanduffel; G Rizzolatti; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  How do adult humans compare with New Caledonian crows in tool selectivity?

Authors:  Francisco J Silva; Kathleen M Silva
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks.

Authors:  Gema Martin-Ordas; Josep Call; Fernando Colmenares
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Do wild raccoons (Procyon lotor) use tools?

Authors:  F Blake Morton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Sequential tool use in great apes.

Authors:  Gema Martin-Ordas; Lena Schumacher; Josep Call
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Food washing and placer mining in captive great apes.

Authors:  Matthias Allritz; Claudio Tennie; Josep Call
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 2.163

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.