OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between blood lead levels and cognitive abilities of children exposed to this metal. METHOD: This is a cross-sectional study that included 134 children aged 6 to 8.5 years old from 3 schools with different risks of lead exposure located in El Callao (Peru). Cognitive assessments were made by means of the Graphic Test of Reasoning (GTR) and the Kohs Block Design Test (KBDT). Blood lead levels and other laboratory tests were performed. RESULTS: Children with lead > 10 ug/dl presented greater prevalence of low scores in the Graphic Test of Reasoning (18.9% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.049) and in the Kohs Block Design Test (KBDT) (39.6% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.01) compared with those with lower lead blood levels. A deficit of 1 category in the Graphic Test of Reasoning was associated with an increase in lead blood level of 16.78 ug/dl (assuming a linear relationship) and from 1 to 5.19 ug/dl (logarithmic model). For each 10 ug/dl of increase in lead levels, the Kohs Block Design Test decreases in 6.24 units (12.91 in males and 0.216 in females) (linear model), and an increase from 1 to 10 ug/dl corresponds to a drop of 16.44 points in the Kohs Block Design Test (31.19 in males and 3.98 in females) (logarithmic model). Considering the Graphic Test of Reasoning subscales, lead levels correlated negatively with the areas of numerical problems (rho = -0.445, p < 0.001), numerical relationships (rho = -0.365, p < 0.001), inferences (rho = -0.281, p = 0.002) and similarities (rho = -0.250, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Lead levels were non-linearly associated with lower cognitive abilities, especially in males, being the numerical reasoning the most affected area.
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between blood lead levels and cognitive abilities of children exposed to this metal. METHOD: This is a cross-sectional study that included 134 children aged 6 to 8.5 years old from 3 schools with different risks of lead exposure located in El Callao (Peru). Cognitive assessments were made by means of the Graphic Test of Reasoning (GTR) and the Kohs Block Design Test (KBDT). Blood lead levels and other laboratory tests were performed. RESULTS:Children with lead > 10 ug/dl presented greater prevalence of low scores in the Graphic Test of Reasoning (18.9% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.049) and in the Kohs Block Design Test (KBDT) (39.6% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.01) compared with those with lower lead blood levels. A deficit of 1 category in the Graphic Test of Reasoning was associated with an increase in lead blood level of 16.78 ug/dl (assuming a linear relationship) and from 1 to 5.19 ug/dl (logarithmic model). For each 10 ug/dl of increase in lead levels, the Kohs Block Design Test decreases in 6.24 units (12.91 in males and 0.216 in females) (linear model), and an increase from 1 to 10 ug/dl corresponds to a drop of 16.44 points in the Kohs Block Design Test (31.19 in males and 3.98 in females) (logarithmic model). Considering the Graphic Test of Reasoning subscales, lead levels correlated negatively with the areas of numerical problems (rho = -0.445, p < 0.001), numerical relationships (rho = -0.365, p < 0.001), inferences (rho = -0.281, p = 0.002) and similarities (rho = -0.250, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Lead levels were non-linearly associated with lower cognitive abilities, especially in males, being the numerical reasoning the most affected area.
Authors: Devon L Graham; Curtis E Grace; Amanda A Braun; Tori L Schaefer; Matthew R Skelton; Peter H Tang; Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams Journal: Int J Dev Neurosci Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 2.457
Authors: Gustavo F Gonzales; Alisson Zevallos; Cynthia Gonzales-Castañeda; Denisse Nuñez; Carmen Gastañaga; César Cabezas; Luke Naeher; Karen Levy; Kyle Steenland Journal: Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica Date: 2014 Jul-Sep
Authors: Johny C Ponce-Canchihuamán; Oscar Pérez-Méndez; Rolando Hernández-Muñoz; Patricia V Torres-Durán; Marco A Juárez-Oropeza Journal: Lipids Health Dis Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Yi Yan Heng; Iqra Asad; Bailey Coleman; Laura Menard; Sarah Benki-Nugent; Faridah Hussein Were; Catherine J Karr; Megan S McHenry Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amalia Laborde; Fernando Tomasina; Fabrizio Bianchi; Marie-Noel Bruné; Irena Buka; Pietro Comba; Lilian Corra; Liliana Cori; Christin Maria Duffert; Raul Harari; Ivano Iavarone; Melissa A McDiarmid; Kimberly A Gray; Peter D Sly; Agnes Soares; William A Suk; Philip J Landrigan Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-12-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Franziska C Landes; Jennifer Inauen; Johny Ponce-Canchihuamán; Kathie Markowski; Tyler K Ellis; Alexander van Geen Journal: Geohealth Date: 2019-08-23
Authors: Oscar A Galagarza; Alejandra Ramirez-Hernandez; Haley F Oliver; Mariel V Álvarez Rodríguez; María Del Carmen Valdez Ortiz; Erika Pachari Vera; Yakelin Cereceda; Yemina K Diaz-Valencia; Amanda J Deering Journal: Foods Date: 2021-06-24