Literature DB >> 16612283

Role of flow cytometry to define unacceptable HLA antigens in lung transplant recipients with HLA-specific antibodies.

James Z Appel1, Matthew G Hartwig, Edward Cantu, Scott M Palmer, Nancy L Reinsmoen, R Duane Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antidonor HLA-specific antibodies have been associated with hyperacute rejection and primary graft failure in lung transplant recipients. Thus, transplant candidates with HLA-specific antibodies generally undergo prospective crossmatching to exclude donors with unacceptable HLA antigens. However, the need to perform a prospective crossmatch limits the donor pool and is associated with increased waiting list times and mortality. A virtual crossmatch strategy using flow cytometry, which enables precise determination of HLA-specific antibody specificity, was compared to prospective crossmatching in sensitized lung transplant candidates.
METHODS: In all, 341 lung transplant recipients were analyzed retrospectively (April 1992 to July 2003). Sixteen patients with HLA-specific antibodies underwent transplantation based on flow cytometric determination of antibody specificity and 10 underwent prospective crossmatching.
RESULTS: Freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) at three years was similar in those undergoing a virtual crossmatch, those undergoing prospective crossmatching, and those without HLA-specific antibodies (80.4% +/- 13.4, 85.7% +/- 13.2, and 73.8% +/- 2.8, respectively, P = 0.88). Three-year survival was also comparable (87.5% +/- 8.3, 70.0% +/- 14.5, and 78.5% +/- 2.4, respectively, P = 0.31). Elimination of prospective crossmatching for sensitized patients was associated with a significant decrease in time on the waiting list (P < 0.01) and in waiting list mortality (P < 0.05). All 16 patients undergoing a virtual crossmatch had negative retrospective crossmatches.
CONCLUSIONS: By carefully determining the specificity of HLA-specific antibodies, flow cytometry methodologies enable the prediction of negative crossmatch results with up to 100% accuracy, enabling the determination of appropriateness of donors. Using this virtual crossmatch strategy, crossmatching can be safely omitted prior to lung transplantation, thereby decreasing waiting list time and mortality rates for candidates with HLA-specific antibodies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612283     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000204046.89396.c5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  17 in total

Review 1.  Acute rejection.

Authors:  Mark Benzimra; Greg L Calligaro; Allan R Glanville
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  HLA antibody analysis: sensitivity, specificity, and clinical significance in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Adriana Zeevi; Alin Girnita; Rene Duquesnoy
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.829

3.  Perception versus reality?: Virtual crossmatch--how to overcome some of the technical and logistic limitations.

Authors:  A R Tambur; D S Ramon; D B Kaufman; J Friedewald; X Luo; B Ho; A Skaro; J Caicedo; D Ladner; T Baker; J Fryer; L Gallon; J Miller; M M Abecassis; J Leventhal
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Antibody-mediated Rejection in Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Hrishikesh S Kulkarni; Bradford C Bemiss; Ramsey R Hachem
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  Innovative application of immunologic principles in heart transplantation.

Authors:  Stacy A Mandras; Joaquin Crespo; Hamang M Patel
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

6.  Increased Calculated Panel Reactive Antigen Is Associated With Increased Waitlist Time and Mortality in Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Yaron D Barac; Mike S Mulvihill; Oliver Jawitz; Jacob Klapper; John Haney; Mani Daneshmand; Basil Nasir; Dongfeng Chen; Carmelo A Milano; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Sensitized renal transplant recipients: current protocols and future directions.

Authors:  James Gloor; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 8.  Management of allosensitized cardiac transplant candidates.

Authors:  Mauricio Velez; Maryl R Johnson
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.943

9.  Report from a consensus conference on the sensitized patient awaiting heart transplantation.

Authors:  Jon Kobashigawa; Mandeep Mehra; Lori West; Ronald Kerman; James George; Marlene Rose; Adriana Zeevi; Nancy Reinsmoen; Jignesh Patel; Elaine F Reed
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 10.  Acute rejection and humoral sensitization in lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  Tereza Martinu; Dong-Feng Chen; Scott M Palmer
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2009-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.