Literature DB >> 16612026

Effects of boar presence on agonistic behavior, shoulder scratches, and stress response of bred sows at mixing.

M J Séguin1, R M Friendship, R N Kirkwood, A J Zanella, T M Widowski.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of boar presence on aggression, shoulder scratches, and salivary cortisol in group-housed sows during the period after mixing, which is when dominance hierarchies are formed. A total of 225 York-shire sows were used. Five groups of 15 sows were each exposed to 1 of 3 levels of boar presence (n = 15): physical (boar in pen with sows; 2.15 m2 per sow), fenceline (boar housed adjacent to sows; 2.3 m2 per sow), or control (no boar in the room; 2.3 m2 per sow). The experiment was divided into 2 phases. In phase 1, behavioral measurements were taken for 48 h after mixing and boar introduction. In phase 2, behavioral measurements were taken beginning on d 6 after mixing and included 24 h before and 48 h after boar removal. In phases 1 and 2, shoulder scratches were scored 24 h before and 24 h after mixing and boar removal, respectively. Saliva samples were collected each morning (0600 to 0700) and afternoon (1600 to 1700) during both phases. Frequencies of intersow aggressive contact (bite, body knock, and head knock) and threats as well as frequencies and durations of fighting bouts were determined from video recordings during daily feeding (49.6 +/- 1.4 min) and nonfeeding (21 +/- 0.2 h) periods. During phase 1, boar presence did not affect the frequency of threats during either the feeding or nonfeeding periods. Control groups had fewer aggressive contacts at feeding during the 25- to 48-h period compared with the fenceline groups (P = 0.01). Total duration of fighting and average fighting bout duration were unaffected by treatment. However, the number of fights occurring during feeding 25 to 48 h postmixing was lower in the physical groups than in the fenceline groups (P = 0.023); measures for the control groups were intermediate. Physical sows also received fewer shoulder scratches postmixing than did control sows (P = 0.048). After mixing, physical sows showed greater morning (P = 0.08) and afternoon (6 h postmixing, P = 0.01; 32 h postmixing, P = 0.08) salivary cortisol concentrations compared with fenceline sows, although they were only numerically greater than those for control sows. During phase 2, removing the boar did not increase fighting among sows or affect shoulder scratches or salivary cortisol concentrations. The presence of a boar was minimally effective at reducing fighting and scratches during the postmixing period, and sows showed a greater stress response in the presence of a boar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612026     DOI: 10.2527/2006.8451227x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  Increased number of skin lesions as a measure of aggression following the mixing of slaughter boars from western Canada assembled for export.

Authors:  Leanne N Paetkau; Terry L Whiting
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  High rates of aggression do not predict rates of trauma in captive groups of macaques.

Authors:  Brianne A Beisner; Lauren J Wooddell; Darcy L Hannibal; Amy Nathman; Brenda McCowan
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.448

3.  Aggression and cortisol levels in three different group housing routines for lactating sows.

Authors:  Ola Thomsson; Ann-Sofi Bergqvist; Ylva Sjunnesson; Lena Eliasson-Selling; Nils Lundeheim; Ulf Magnusson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Systematic review of animal-based indicators to measure thermal, social, and immune-related stress in pigs.

Authors:  Raúl David Guevara; Jose J Pastor; Xavier Manteca; Gemma Tedo; Pol Llonch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  A systematic review of the impact of housing on sow welfare during post-weaning and early pregnancy periods.

Authors:  Jen-Yun Chou; Thomas D Parsons
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-08-23

6.  Welfare and Performance of Post-Weaning Sows and Piglets Previously Housed in Farrowing Pens with Temporary Crating on a Spanish Commercial Farm: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Heng-Lun Ko; Déborah Temple; Janni Hales; Xavier Manteca; Pol Llonch
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.