Literature DB >> 16611568

The coaching schematic: validation through expert coach consensus.

Andy Abraham1, Dave Collins, Russell Martindale.   

Abstract

Current research in coaching development infers that coaching is predominantly a decision-making process. The same and other research is not, however, informing the coaching development process due to a lack of a big picture approach. Consequently, there is a need for a model of coaching. In this paper, we offer such a model in the form of a schematic that reflects the coaching process from both a content and information-processing stance. To assess the validity of the schematic, 16 expert coaches were interviewed to elicit a complete description of their coaching process. The coaches were then shown a copy of the schematic and asked to comment on its design and content with respect to its accuracy in reflecting their coaching process. Following analysis of the interview, six general categories emerged: Roles, Goals, Typical Actions, Required Knowledge, Support for the Schematic, and Factors Influencing Development. The first four categories clearly displayed an implicit support for the schematic. Furthermore, all coaches offered explicit support for the schematic. Such strong support confirmed that the schematic was valid and could form the basis of focused interventions in coaching development.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16611568     DOI: 10.1080/02640410500189173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  11 in total

1.  Coaches' perceptions of competence and acknowledgement of training needs related to professional competences.

Authors:  Sofia Santos; Isabel Mesquita; Amândio Graça; António Rosado
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Portuguese Coaches' Perceptions of and Preferences for Knowledge Sources Related to their Professional Background.

Authors:  Isabel Mesquita; Sofia Isidro; António Rosado
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Handball coaches' perceptions about the value of working competences according to their coaching background.

Authors:  Isabel Mesquita; Mario Borges; Antonio Rosado; Adriano De Souza
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Practical skills of rhythmic gymnastics judges.

Authors:  Maria A Fernandez-Villarino; Marta Bobo-Arce; Elena Sierra-Palmeiro
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  What Do Olympic Shooters Think about Physical Training Factors and Their Performance?

Authors:  Daniel Mon-López; Francisco Moreira da Silva; Santiago Calero Morales; Olga López-Torres; Jorge Lorenzo Calvo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Investigating Possible Effects from a One-Year Coach-Education Program.

Authors:  Frode Moen; Maja Olsen; John Anders Bjørkøy
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-26

7.  Assessing the importance given by basketball coaches to training contents.

Authors:  Nuno Leite; Eduarda Coelho; Jaime Sampaio
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 2.193

8.  The importance of sports performance factors and training contents from the perspective of futsal coaches.

Authors:  João Serrano; Shakib Shahidian; Jaime Sampaio; Nuno Leite
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Nutritional knowledge of UK coaches.

Authors:  Emma Cockburn; Alistair Fortune; Marc Briggs; Penny Rumbold
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Use of Sports Science Knowledge by Turkish Coaches.

Authors:  Koray Kilic; Mustafa Levent Ince
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2015-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.