Literature DB >> 16611516

Overall quality of outcomes framework scores lower in practices in deprived areas.

Jim Wright1, David Martin, Samantha Cockings, Clare Polack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been much debate as to whether quality points allocated through the new general medical services contract are more difficult to achieve for practices in deprived and rural areas. We used multiple regression to assess the relationships between deprivation, rurality and the number of overall quality points achieved by each practice. Multiple deprivation was significantly inversely related to quality points achieved. Practices in villages and towns gained 2% more quality points than urban areas and hamlets.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16611516      PMCID: PMC1832235     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  3 in total

Review 1.  Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK.

Authors:  M Goddard; P Smith
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The Index of Multiple Deprivation 2000 and accessibility effects on health.

Authors:  H Jordan; P Roderick; D Martin
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Association of deprivation, ethnicity, and sex with quality indicators for diabetes: population based survey of 53,000 patients in primary care.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Shaun O'Hanlon; Carol Coupland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-17
  3 in total
  21 in total

1.  The relationship between social deprivation and the quality of primary care: a national survey using indicators from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Authors:  Mark Ashworth; Paul Seed; David Armstrong; Stevo Durbaba; Roger Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The Quality and Outcomes Framework: too early for a final verdict.

Authors:  Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Profile of English salaried GPs: labour mobility and practice performance.

Authors:  Alexander Ding; Mark Hann; Bonnie Sibbald
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Pay for performance in primary care: proceed with caution, pitfalls ahead.

Authors:  Brian Hutchison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-08

5.  Which factors are associated with higher rates of chronic kidney disease recording in primary care? A cross-sectional survey of GP practices.

Authors:  Nicola Walker; John Bankart; Nigel Brunskill; Richard Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Deprivation and primary care funding in Greater Manchester after devolution: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Jessica A Lee; Rachel Meacock; Evangelos Kontopantelis; James Matheson; Matthew Gittins
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Rurality and event-free survival in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Jia-Rong Wu; Debra K Moser; Mary Kay Rayens; Marla J De Jong; Misook L Chung; Barbara Riegel; Terry A Lennie
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.210

8.  Impact of the 2004 GMS contract on practice nurses: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Wendy McGregor; Hussein Jabareen; Catherine A O'Donnell; Stewart W Mercer; Graham Cm Watt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Estimating prevalence of coronary heart disease for small areas using collateral indicators of morbidity.

Authors:  Peter Congdon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Stephen M Campbell; Ruth McDonald; Helen Lester
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.