Literature DB >> 16611513

The acceptability of routine inquiry about domestic violence towards women: a survey in three healthcare settings.

Adrian Boyle1, Peter B Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Domestic violence is frequently only disclosed when healthcare staff directly inquire. Healthcare staff worry that inquiry may offend. AIM: To identify the characteristics of women who find inquiry about domestic violence by healthcare staff unacceptable. DESIGN OF STUDY: Anonymous interview based cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Three general practice surgeries, one antenatal clinic and one emergency department in Cambridge, England, with a total of 2306 women attending for health care.
METHOD: Cross-sectional survey.
RESULTS: In total 1452 completed questionnaires were returned; response rate 63%. One hundred and twenty-two women (8.4%) indicated that they found inquiry by healthcare staff unacceptable. Women at the emergency department and GP surgeries were more likely to find inquiry unacceptable (odds ratio [OR] = 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 9.9) and (OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.3 to 11.5) respectively, than in the antenatal clinic. Women at the antenatal clinic reported lower rates of abuse within 1 year than at the emergency department or antenatal clinic. Abuse within 1 year was strongly associated with finding inquiry unacceptable (OR = 4.5, 95% CI = 1.8 to 11.4), but not lifetime abuse (OR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.5 to 1.9).
CONCLUSIONS: Inquiry about domestic violence by healthcare staff is acceptable to most women. Acceptability is highest in women who have not been abused in the last year and who are attending the antenatal clinic. Women who attend the antenatal clinic have lower rates of abuse within 1 year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16611513      PMCID: PMC1832232     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  12 in total

1.  Routinely asking women about domestic violence: seeking the causes of disease, not routine inquiry, is good practice.

Authors:  Fiona Duxbury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-06

2.  Routinely asking women about domestic violence in health settings.

Authors:  Ann Taket; Jo Nurse; Katrina Smith; Judy Watson; Judy Shakespeare; Vicky Lavis; Katie Cosgrove; Kate Mulley; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-20

3.  Women's perceptions and experiences of routine enquiry for domestic violence in a maternity service.

Authors:  Loraine Bacchu; Gill Mezey; Susan Bewley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Identifying domestic violence: cross sectional study in primary care.

Authors:  Jo Richardson; Jeremy Coid; Ann Petruckevitch; Wai Shan Chung; Stirling Moorey; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-02

5.  Women's responses to screening for domestic violence in a health-care setting.

Authors:  J Webster; S M Stratigos; K M Grimes
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Violent victimization of women and men: physical and psychiatric symptoms.

Authors:  John H Porcerelli; Rosemary Cogan; Patricia P West; Edward A Rose; Dawn Lambrecht; Karen E Wilson; Richard K Severson; Dunia Karana
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

7.  Women's opinions about domestic violence screening and mandatory reporting.

Authors:  A C Gielen; P J O'Campo; J C Campbell; J Schollenberger; A B Woods; A S Jones; J A Dienemann; J Kub; E C Wynne
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Screening for intimate partner violence by health care providers. Barriers and interventions.

Authors:  J Waalen; M M Goodwin; A M Spitz; R Petersen; L E Saltzman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Mothers' and health care providers' perspectives on screening for intimate partner violence in a pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  M Denise Dowd; Christopher Kennedy; Jane F Knapp; Jennifer Stallbaumer-Rouyer
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2002-08

10.  Reproductive violence screening in primary care: perspectives and experiences of patients and battered women.

Authors:  L A McNutt; B E Carlson; D Gagen; N Winterbauer
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  1999
View more
  5 in total

1.  Responding to intimate partner violence: what role for general practice?

Authors:  Gene Feder
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Women's views and experiences of antenatal enquiry for domestic abuse during pregnancy.

Authors:  Debra Salmon; Kathleen M Baird; Paul White
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Physical and social predictors of partner abuse in women attending general practice: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kelsey Hegarty; Jane Gunn; Patty Chondros; Angela Taft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Intimate Partner Violence Documentation and Awareness in an Urban Emergency Department.

Authors:  Janeske Vonkeman; Paul Atkinson; Jacqueline Fraser; Rose McCloskey; Adrian Boyle
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-12-28

5.  Barriers among Danish women and general practitioners to raising the issue of intimate partner violence in general practice: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Trine Mørk; Pernille Tanggaard Andersen; Ann Taket
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.