Literature DB >> 16611204

The risk of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer in users of hormonal preparations.

Leslie Bernstein1.   

Abstract

Because endogenous hormones play a major role in the risk of breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer, the impact on risk of oral contraceptives and of hormonal therapy given at about the time of menopause has been a major concern. Numerous studies provide insight into whether risk is increased or decreased in association with use of these preparations. Oral contraceptives present a chemopreventive opportunity for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer as risk is dramatically lower among women who have used these preparations than among those who have not. Balanced against this is the potential for risk of breast cancer to be increased with oral contraceptive use. A pooled analysis of studies conducted through the early 1990s found that only current or recent users were at higher risk of breast cancer, but two more recent studies provide conflicting results with one showing no impact of oral contraceptives on risk of any group of women and the other showing an increase in risk with use. Among women participating in observational studies who are current or recent users of oestrogen therapy and who have relatively long durations of use, risk of breast cancer is modestly elevated; results from the Women's Health Initiative trial, based on a relatively short duration of oestrogen use are consistent with these observations. Oestrogen therapy increases endometrial cancer risk dramatically. It may also increase the risk of ovarian cancer; however more study of this issue is needed as the literature is inconsistent. Combined oestrogen and progestin therapy increases breast cancer risk by as much as 10% per year of use. Endometrial cancer risk is not elevated when combined therapy is given in a cyclic manner with progestin administered only part of the time and it is reduced when both oestrogen and progestin are administered on a daily basis. As with oestrogen therapy, the impact of combined therapy on ovarian cancer risk is uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16611204     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_277.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-7835            Impact factor:   4.080


  14 in total

1.  Body size and the risk of ovarian cancer by hormone therapy use in the California Teachers Study cohort.

Authors:  Alison J Canchola; Ellen T Chang; Leslie Bernstein; Joan A Largent; Peggy Reynolds; Dennis Deapen; Katherine D Henderson; Giske Ursin; Pamela L Horn-Ross
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Estrogen and progestogen use in postmenopausal women: July 2008 position statement of The North American Menopause Society.

Authors:  Wulf H Utian; David F Archer; Gloria A Bachmann; Christopher Gallagher; Francine n Grodstein; Julia R Heiman; Victor W Henderson; Howard N Hodis; Richard H Karas; Rogerio A Lobo; JoAnn E Manson; Robert L Reid; Peter J Schmidt; Cynthia A Stuenkel
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Physical activity and sex hormone levels in estradiol- and placebo-treated postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Farzana Choudhury; Leslie Bernstein; Howard N Hodis; Frank Z Stanczyk; Wendy J Mack
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Cancer incidence attributable to the use of oral contraceptives and hormone therapy in Alberta in 2012.

Authors:  Xin Grevers; Anne Grundy; Abbey E Poirier; Farah Khandwala; Matthew Feldman; Christine M Friedenreich; Darren R Brenner
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-12-12

5.  Family history of hormonal cancers and colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study conducted in Ontario.

Authors:  Ji-Hyun Jang; Michelle Cotterchio; Steven Gallinger; Julia A Knight; Darshana Daftary
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  A diarylheptanoid phytoestrogen from Curcuma comosa, 1,7-diphenyl-4,6-heptadien-3-ol, accelerates human osteoblast proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  Duangrat Tantikanlayaporn; Lisa J Robinson; Apichart Suksamrarn; Pawinee Piyachaturawat; Harry C Blair
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.340

7.  Reproductive history in relation to breast cancer risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Authors:  Carol Sweeney; Kathy B Baumgartner; Tim Byers; Anna R Giuliano; Jennifer S Herrick; Maureen A Murtaugh; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Calycosin stimulates the proliferation of endothelial cells, but not breast cancer cells, via a feedback loop involving RP11-65M17.3, BRIP1 and ERα.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Wei Xie; Mengyue Hou; Jing Tian; Xing Zhang; Qianyao Ren; Yue Huang; Jian Chen
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.682

9.  Serum Müllerian inhibiting substance levels are lower in premenopausal women with breast precancer and cancer.

Authors:  Andrew C McCoy; Beth Kliethermes; Ke Zhang; Wenyi Qin; Robert Sticca; Michael Bouton; Edward R Sauter
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-05-26

10.  Prospective case-control study of serum mullerian inhibiting substance and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Joanne F Dorgan; Frank Z Stanczyk; Brian L Egleston; Lisa L Kahle; Christiana M Shaw; Cynthia S Spittle; Andrew K Godwin; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.