Literature DB >> 16610567

Spanish cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Raúl Domínguez1, José F Vila, Federico Augustovski, Vilma Irazola, Pablo R Castillo, Roberto Rotta Escalante, Thomas G Brott, James F Meschia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To adapt and validate a Spanish-language version (SV) of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) to facilitate its use in Spanish-speaking contexts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The methods recommended by the International Quality of Life Assessment Project were followed. Two forward translations and 1 back translation of the NIHSS were developed to ensure lingual and cultural equivalence. A final revised SV-NIHSS was administered by 8 physicians to patients with stroke in 3 clinics in Buenos Aires, Argentina, from September 2003 to December 2003.
RESULTS: The study included 102 patients (mean +/- SD age, 73.3+/-6.5 years; 56% women) with stroke (86% ischemic). The SV-NIHSS mean baseline score was 9.78+/-7.04. Interrater reliability was Independently evaluated for 98 patients, showing a high agreement: kappa, 0.77 to 0.99 for the 15 items; interrater correlation coefficient, 0.991 (95% confidence Interval, 0.987-0.994). Intrarater reliability was excellent: kappa, 0.86 to 1.00 for the 15 items; mean intrarater correlation coefficient, 0.994 (95% confidence interval, 0.991-0.996). Construct validity was also adequate; the SV-NIHSS had a negative correlation with baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (Spearman coefficient = -0.574, P < .001) and with Barthel index at 3 months (Spearman coefficient = -0.658, P < .001). Patients with different Rankin scores at 3 months also had significantly different baseline SV-NIHSS scores, from a mean of 4.29+/-2.21 for Rankin score of 0 to a mean of 29.40+/-3.97 for Rankin score of 6 (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This study shows that a Spanish-language version of the NIHSS developed with internationally recommended methods is reliable and valid when applied in a Spanish-speaking setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16610567     DOI: 10.4065/81.4.476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  11 in total

1.  Door-to-door capture of incident and prevalent stroke cases in Durango, Mexico: the Brain Attack Surveillance in Durango Study.

Authors:  Carlos Cantu-Brito; Jennifer J Majersik; Brisa N Sánchez; Angel Ruano; Daniela Becerra-Mendoza; Jeffrey J Wing; Lewis B Morgenstern
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Validity and reliability of a korean version of the national institutes of health stroke scale.

Authors:  Mi Sun Oh; Kyung-Ho Yu; Ju-Hun Lee; San Jung; Im-Suck Ko; Joon-Hyun Shin; Soo-Jin Cho; Hui-Chul Choi; Hyang Hee Kim; Byung-Chul Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Validation of the Spanish, Portuguese and French versions of the Lupus Damage Index questionnaire: data from North and South America, Spain and Portugal.

Authors:  B A Pons-Estel; J Sánchez-Guerrero; J Romero-Díaz; A Iglesias-Gamarra; E Bonfa; E F Borba; S K Shinjo; S Bernatsky; A Clarke; M A García; J C Marcos; A Duarte; G A Berbotto; H Scherbarth; C D Marques; L Onetti; V Saurit; A W S Souza; E Velozo; L J Catoggio; O Neira; P I Burgos; L A Ramirez; J F Molina; I G De La Torre; R Silvariño; J A Manni; S Durán-Barragán; L M Vilá; P R Fortin; J Calvo-Alén; M J Santos; M Portela; M H Esteva-Spinetti; M Weisman; E M Acevedo; M I Segami; S B Gentiletti; J Roldán; I Navarro; E Gonzalez; J M Liu; E W Karlson; K H Costenbader; F Wolfe; G S Alarcón
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.911

4.  The modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: its time has come.

Authors:  B C Meyer; P D Lyden
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.266

5.  Spanish Version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Awareness and Use in United States. A Survey Study.

Authors:  Enrique Villalobos; Scott R Barnes; Ihtesham A Qureshi; Salvador Cruz-Flores; Alberto Maud; Gustavo J Rodriguez
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2017-01

6.  The adaption and evaluation of a Latvian version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Authors:  Kristaps Jurjāns; Iļja Noviks; Diāna Volčeka; Linda Zandersone; Kristīne Meilerte; Evija Miglāne; Ainars Stepens; Andrejs Millers
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Validation of a Polish version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: Do moderate psychometric properties affect its clinical utility?

Authors:  Adam Wiśniewski; Karolina Filipska; Marlena Puchowska; Katarzyna Piec; Filip Jaskólski; Robert Ślusarz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Challenging comparison of stroke scales.

Authors:  Kavian Ghandehari
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Functional rehabilitation of upper limb apraxia in poststroke patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jose Manuel Pérez-Mármol; M Carmen García-Ríos; Francisco J Barrero-Hernandez; Guadalupe Molina-Torres; Ted Brown; María Encarnación Aguilar-Ferrándiz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Rehabilitation Profiles of Older Adult Stroke Survivors Admitted to Intermediate Care Units: A Multi-Centre Study.

Authors:  Laura M Pérez; Marco Inzitari; Terence J Quinn; Joan Montaner; Ricard Gavaldà; Esther Duarte; Laura Coll-Planas; Mercè Cerdà; Sebastià Santaeugenia; Conxita Closa; Miquel Gallofré
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.