Literature DB >> 16610564

Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommendations regarding routine testing for human immunodeficiency virus by an inpatient service: who are we missing?

Jeffrey L Greenwald1, Catherine A Rich, Samantha Bessega, Michael A Posner, Jared Lane Maeda, Paul R Skolnik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of hospitalized patients who tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by a routine inpatient testing service, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who might not have been identified had routine testing not been offered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the medical records of patients who tested HIV positive by the inpatient testing service between 1999 and 2003 were compared with the medical records of inpatients who tested HIV negative by the inpatient testing service and the medical records of patients who tested HIV positive in ambulatory settings. We compared HIV risk factors, discharge diagnoses, CD4 cell counts, and HIV RNA concentrations.
RESULTS: A total of 243 patients participated in this study: 81 patients who tested HIV positive and 81 who tested HIV negative by the inpatient testing service, and 81 patients who tested HIV positive in ambulatory settings. Both HIV-positive inpatients and HIV-positive outpatients had similar frequencies of HIV risk factors (46% vs 43%; P=.75). Both groups differed significantly from HIV-negative inpatients (4%; P<.001). Comparing HIV-positive inpatients with HIV-positive outpatients, CD4 cell counts were lower (196 vs 371 cells/mm3; P<.001), and HIV RNA levels were higher (4.61 vs 4.09 Iog, HIV RNA; P=.001). At diagnosis, 64 HIV-positive inpatients (79%) met criteria for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome compared with 21 HIV-positive outpatients (26%) (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Patients who tested HIV positive through inpatient testing have more advanced disease than those identified as outpatients. Half of these patients would not have been identified had testing not been routinely offered. Routine inpatient HIV testing offers an important opportunity to identify patients with HIV infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16610564     DOI: 10.4065/81.4.452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  9 in total

1.  Risk-based HIV testing in South Carolina health care settings failed to identify the majority of infected individuals.

Authors:  Wayne A Duffus; Kristina Weis; Lynda Kettinger; Terri Stephens; Helmut Albrecht; James J Gibson
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.078

2.  Expanding Hospital Human Immunodeficiency Virus Testing in the Bronx, New York and Washington, District of Columbia: Results From the HPTN 065 Study.

Authors:  Bernard M Branson; Pollyanna R Chavez; Brett Hanscom; Elizabeth Greene; Laura McKinstry; Kate Buchacz; Geetha Beauchamp; Theresa Gamble; Barry S Zingman; Edward Telzak; Tammey Naab; Lisa Fitzpatrick; Wafaa M El-Sadr
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  HIV screening practices in U.S. hospitals, 2009-2010.

Authors:  Andrew C Voetsch; James D Heffelfinger; Juliet Yonek; Pragna Patel; Steven F Ethridge; Gretchen W Torres; Margaret A Lampe; Bernard M Branson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  HIV testing and referral to care in U.S. hospitals prior to 2006: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Gretchen Williams Torres; Juliet Yonek; Jeremy Pickreign; Heidi Whitmore; Romana Hasnain-Wynia
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  HIV partner notification: predictors of discussion and agreements from provider reports.

Authors:  Dallas T Swendeman; Oscar Grusky; Aimee-Noelle Swanson
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2009-01-30

6.  Patient risks, outcomes, and costs of voluntary HIV testing at five testing sites within a medical center.

Authors:  Supriya D Mehta; Jonathan Hall; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Kevin Cranston; Paul R Skolnik
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  The past, present, and future of HIV prevention: integrating behavioral, biomedical, and structural intervention strategies for the next generation of HIV prevention.

Authors:  Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus; Dallas Swendeman; Gary Chovnick
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 18.561

8.  Evaluation of the Utility of Point-of-Care HIV Testing on a Canadian Internal Medicine Inpatient Unit.

Authors:  Lawrence Lau; Beverly Wudel; Eugene Lee; Majid Darraj; Quinlan Richert; Adriana Trajtman; Kim Bresler; Jared Bullard; Ken Kasper; Marissa Becker; Yoav Keynan
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Routine rapid HIV screening in six community health centers serving populations at risk.

Authors:  Janet J Myers; Cheryl Modica; Mi-Suk Kang Dufour; Caryn Bernstein; Kathleen McNamara
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.128

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.