Literature DB >> 16609993

Influence of gastric inhibitory polypeptide on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls.

Juris J Meier1, Michael A Nauck, Bartholomaeus Kask, Jens J Holst, Carolyn F Deacon, Wolfgang E Schmidt, Baptist Gallwitz.   

Abstract

AIM: Gastric inhibitory polypeptide is secreted from intestinal K-cells in response to nutrient ingestion and acts as an incretin hormone in human physiology. While animal experiments suggested a role for GIP as an inhibitor of gastric secretion, the GIP effects on gastric acid output in humans are still controversial.
METHODS: Pentagastrin was administered at an infusion rate of 1 microg . kg(-1) . h(-1) over 300 min in 8 patients with type 2 diabetes (2 female, 6 male, 54+/- 10 years, BMI 30.5+/- 2.2 kg/m(2); no history of autonomic neuropathy) and 8 healthy subjects (2/6, 46+/- 6 years., 28.9+/- 5.3 kg/m(2)). A hyperglycaemic clamp (140 mg/dl) was performed over 240 min. Placebo, GIP at a physiological dose (1 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1)), and GIP at a pharmacological dose (4 pmol . kg(-1) . min(-1)) were administered over 60 min each. Boluses of placebo, 20 pmol GIP/kg, and 80 pmol GIP/kg were injected intravenously at the beginning of each infusion period, respectively. Gastric volume, acid and chloride output were analysed in 15-min intervals. Capillary and venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of glucose and total GIP. Statistics were carried out by repeated-measures ANOVA and one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS: Plasma glucose concentrations during the hyperglycaemic clamp experiments were not different between patients with type 2 diabetes and controls. Steady-state GIP plasma levels were 61+/- 8 and 79+/- 12 pmol/l during the low-dose and 327+/- 35 and 327+/- 17 pmol/l during the high-dose infusion of GIP, in healthy control subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes, respectively (P=0.23 and P=0.99). Pentagastrin markedly increased gastric acid and chloride secretion (P< 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rates of gastric acid or chloride output between the experimental periods with placebo or any dose of GIP. The temporal patterns of gastric acid and chloride secretion were similar in patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls (P=0.86 and P=0.61, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion is similar in patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls. GIP administration does not influence gastric acid secretion at physiological or pharmacological plasma levels. Therefore, GIP appears to act as an incretin rather than as an enterogastrone in human physiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16609993      PMCID: PMC4087512          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i12.1874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  40 in total

1.  Further purification of a polypeptide demonstrating enterogastrone activity.

Authors:  J C Brown; V Mutt; R A Pederson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Reduced insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  J J Meier; K Hücking; J J Holst; C F Deacon; W H Schmiegel; M A Nauck
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.461

3.  Secretion of incretin hormones (GIP and GLP-1) and incretin effect after oral glucose in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Michael A Nauck; Andrea El-Ouaghlidi; Bartholomäus Gabrys; Katrin Hücking; Jens J Holst; Carolyn F Deacon; Baptist Gallwitz; Wolfgang E Schmidt; Juris J Meier
Journal:  Regul Pept       Date:  2004-11-15

4.  Gastric acid and pancreatic polypeptide responses to sham feeding are impaired in diabetic subjects with autonomic neuropathy.

Authors:  M Buysschaert; J Donckier; A Dive; J M Ketelslegers; A E Lambert
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Both GLP-1 and GIP are insulinotropic at basal and postprandial glucose levels and contribute nearly equally to the incretin effect of a meal in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Tina Vilsbøll; Thure Krarup; Sten Madsbad; Jens J Holst
Journal:  Regul Pept       Date:  2003-07-15

Review 6.  Gastric inhibitory polypeptide: the neglected incretin revisited.

Authors:  Juris J Meier; Michael A Nauck; Wolfgang E Schmidt; Baptist Gallwitz
Journal:  Regul Pept       Date:  2002-07-15

7.  Gastric inhibitory polypeptide does not inhibit gastric emptying in humans.

Authors:  Juris J Meier; Oliver Goetze; Jens Anstipp; Dirk Hagemann; Jens J Holst; Wolfgang E Schmidt; Baptist Gallwitz; Michael A Nauck
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 4.310

8.  Normalization of glucose concentrations and deceleration of gastric emptying after solid meals during intravenous glucagon-like peptide 1 in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Juris J Meier; Baptist Gallwitz; Stefan Salmen; Oliver Goetze; Jens J Holst; Wolfgang E Schmidt; Michael A Nauck
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) dose-dependently stimulates glucagon secretion in healthy human subjects at euglycaemia.

Authors:  J J Meier; B Gallwitz; N Siepmann; J J Holst; C F Deacon; W E Schmidt; M A Nauck
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2003-05-23       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Defective amplification of the late phase insulin response to glucose by GIP in obese Type II diabetic patients.

Authors:  T Vilsbøll; T Krarup; S Madsbad; J J Holst
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2002-07-04       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.