PURPOSE: The influence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification on glioblastoma patient prognosis following definitive radiotherapy has been extensively investigated in clinical studies, and yet the relationship between EGFR status and radiation response remains unclear. The intent of the current study was to address this relationship using several EGFR-amplified glioblastoma xenografts in an orthotopic athymic mouse model. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined the effect of radiation on the survival of nude mice with intracranial xenografts derived from 13 distinct patient tumors, 7 of which have amplified EGFR. Mice with established intracranial tumors were randomized to sham treatment or 12-Gy radiation in six fractions delivered over 12 days. RESULTS: For six of the xenografts, radiation of mice with intracranial tumor significantly extended survival, and four of these xenografts had EGFR amplification. For seven other xenografts, radiation treatment did not significantly extend survival, and three of these, including GBM12, had EGFR amplification. Similar to EGFR, the tumor genetic status of p53 or PTEN did not show preferential association with radiation-sensitive or radiation-resistant xenografts whereas hyperphosphorylation of Akt on Ser(473) was associated with increased radioresistance. To specifically investigate whether inhibition of EGFR kinase activity influences radiation response, we examined combined radiation and EGFR inhibitor treatment in mice with intracranial GBM12. The combination of oral erlotinib administered concurrently with radiation resulted only in additive survival benefit relative to either agent alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that EGFR amplification, as a biomarker, is not singularly predictive of glioblastoma response to radiation therapy, nor does the inhibition of EGFR enhance the intrinsic radiation responsiveness of glioblastoma tumors. However, efficacious EGFR inhibitor and radiation monotherapy regimens can be used in combination to achieve additive antitumor effect against a subset of glioblastoma.
PURPOSE: The influence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification on glioblastomapatient prognosis following definitive radiotherapy has been extensively investigated in clinical studies, and yet the relationship between EGFR status and radiation response remains unclear. The intent of the current study was to address this relationship using several EGFR-amplified glioblastoma xenografts in an orthotopic athymic mouse model. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined the effect of radiation on the survival of nude mice with intracranial xenografts derived from 13 distinct patienttumors, 7 of which have amplified EGFR. Mice with established intracranial tumors were randomized to sham treatment or 12-Gy radiation in six fractions delivered over 12 days. RESULTS: For six of the xenografts, radiation of mice with intracranial tumor significantly extended survival, and four of these xenografts had EGFR amplification. For seven other xenografts, radiation treatment did not significantly extend survival, and three of these, including GBM12, had EGFR amplification. Similar to EGFR, the tumor genetic status of p53 or PTEN did not show preferential association with radiation-sensitive or radiation-resistant xenografts whereas hyperphosphorylation of Akt on Ser(473) was associated with increased radioresistance. To specifically investigate whether inhibition of EGFR kinase activity influences radiation response, we examined combined radiation and EGFR inhibitor treatment in mice with intracranial GBM12. The combination of oral erlotinib administered concurrently with radiation resulted only in additive survival benefit relative to either agent alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that EGFR amplification, as a biomarker, is not singularly predictive of glioblastoma response to radiation therapy, nor does the inhibition of EGFR enhance the intrinsic radiation responsiveness of glioblastoma tumors. However, efficacious EGFR inhibitor and radiation monotherapy regimens can be used in combination to achieve additive antitumor effect against a subset of glioblastoma.
Authors: Vy M Tran; Anna Wade; Andrew McKinney; Katharine Chen; Olle R Lindberg; Jane R Engler; Anders I Persson; Joanna J Phillips Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Ying Zhang; Nichola Cruickshanks; Fang Yuan; Baomin Wang; Mary Pahuski; Julia Wulfkuhle; Isela Gallagher; Alexander F Koeppel; Sarah Hatef; Christopher Papanicolas; Jeongwu Lee; Eli E Bar; David Schiff; Stephen D Turner; Emanuel F Petricoin; Lloyd S Gray; Roger Abounader Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jiangyang Zhang; Peter C M van Zijl; John Laterra; Amandeep Salhotra; Bachchu Lal; Susumu Mori; Jinyuan Zhou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Qi-Wen Fan; Christine Cheng; Zachary A Knight; Daphne Haas-Kogan; David Stokoe; C David James; Frank McCormick; Kevan M Shokat; William A Weiss Journal: Sci Signal Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 8.192
Authors: Michelle J Clarke; Evan A Mulligan; Patrick T Grogan; Ann C Mladek; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Nicola J Curtin; Zhenkun Lou; Paul A Decker; Wenting Wu; E Ruth Plummer; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Ying Zhang; Kaitlyn E Farenholtz; Yanzhi Yang; Fadila Guessous; Charles G Dipierro; Valerie S Calvert; Jianghong Deng; David Schiff; Wenjun Xin; Jae K Lee; Benjamin Purow; James Christensen; Emanuel Petricoin; Roger Abounader Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joshua C Anderson; Christine W Duarte; Karim Welaya; Timothy D Rohrbach; Markus Bredel; Eddy S Yang; Nirmal V Choradia; Jaideep V Thottassery; George Yancey Gillespie; James A Bonner; Christopher D Willey Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Marianela Candolfi; James F Curtin; W Stephen Nichols; Akm G Muhammad; Gwendalyn D King; G Elizabeth Pluhar; Elizabeth A McNiel; John R Ohlfest; Andrew B Freese; Peter F Moore; Jonathan Lerner; Pedro R Lowenstein; Maria G Castro Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2007-09-15 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Sandra L Tye; Anne G Gilg; Lauren B Tolliver; William G Wheeler; Bryan P Toole; Bernard L Maria Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Gaspar J Kitange; Brett L Carlson; Mark A Schroeder; Patrick T Grogan; Jeff D Lamont; Paul A Decker; Wenting Wu; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 12.300