Literature DB >> 16608750

Implicit learning of a repeated segment in continuous tracking: a reappraisal.

Stephanie Chambaron1, Dominique Ginhac, Carole Ferrel-Chapus, Pierre Perruchet.   

Abstract

Several prior studies (e.g., Shea, Wulf, Whitacre, & Park, 2001; Wulf & Schmidt, 1997) have apparently demonstrated implicit learning of a repeated segment in continuous-tracking tasks. In two conceptual replications of these studies, we failed to reproduce the original findings. However, these findings were reproduced in a third experiment, in which we used the same repeated segment as that used in the Wulf et al. studies. Analyses of the velocity and the acceleration of the target suggests that this repeated segment could be easier to track than the random segments serving as control, accounting for the results of Wulf and collaborators. Overall these experiments suggest that learning a repeated segment in continuous-tracking tasks may be much more difficult than learning from a repeated sequence in conventional serial reaction time tasks. A possible explanation for this difference is outlined.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16608750     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500198585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  16 in total

Review 1.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  Compensatory postural adaptations during continuous, variable amplitude perturbations reveal generalized rather than sequence-specific learning.

Authors:  K Van Ooteghem; J S Frank; F Allard; J J Buchanan; A R Oates; F B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Implicit sequence learning in a continuous pursuit-tracking task.

Authors:  Alexandre Lang; Olivier Gapenne; Dominique Aubert; Carole Ferrel-Chapus
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-10-30

4.  Performing the unexplainable: implicit task performance reveals individually reliable sequence learning without explicit knowledge.

Authors:  Daniel J Sanchez; Eric W Gobel; Paul J Reber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

5.  Sensory information in perceptual-motor sequence learning: visual and/or tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Willem B Verwey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Practice and sleep form different aspects of skill.

Authors:  Sunbin Song; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Correlations between brain activity and components of motor learning in middle-aged adults: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Katie Wadden; Katlyn Brown; Rebecca Maletsky; Lara A Boyd
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Redundant sensory information does not enhance sequence learning in the serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Willem B Verwey; Izabela Szumska; Piotr Jaśkowski
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-03-01

9.  Exposing sequence learning in a double-step task.

Authors:  Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Implicit and Explicit Learning of a Sequential Postural Weight-Shifting Task in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Simone R Caljouw; Renee Veldkamp; Claudine J C Lamoth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.