Literature DB >> 16608718

Will opposites attract? Similarities and differences in students' perceptions of the stereotype profiles of other health and social care professional groups.

Sarah Hean1, Jill Macleod Clark, Kim Adams, Debra Humphris.   

Abstract

The extent to which health and social care (HSC) students hold stereotypical views of other HSC professional groups is of great potential importance to team working in health care. This paper explores students' perceptions of different HSC professional groups at the beginning of their university programmes. Findings are presented from an analysis of baseline data collected as part of the New Generation Project longitudinal cohort study which is assessing the impact of interprofessional education over time on a range of variables including stereotyping. Questionnaires were administered to a cohort of over 1200 students from 10 different HSC professional groups entering their first year of university. Stereotypes were measured using a tool adapted from Barnes et al. (2000) designed to elicit stereotype ratings on a range of nine characteristics. The findings confirm that students arrive at university with an established and consistent set of stereotypes about other health and social care professional groups. Stereotypical profiles were compiled for each professional group indicating the distinctive characteristics of the groups as well as the similarities and differences between groups.Midwives, social workers and nurses were rated most highly on interpersonal skills and on being a team player whilst doctors were rated most highly on academic ability. Doctors, midwives and social workers were perceived as having the strongest leadership role, whilst doctors were also rated most highly on decision making. All professions were rated highly on confidence and professional competence and, with the exception of social workers, on practical skills. A comparison of profiles for each professional group reveals that, for example, pharmacists and doctors were perceived as having very similar characteristics as were social workers, midwives and nurses. However, the profiles of nurses and doctors were perceived to be very different. The implications of these similarities and differences are discussed in terms of their potential impact on interprofessional interactions, role boundaries and team working.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16608718     DOI: 10.1080/13561820600646546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  13 in total

1.  A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Medical Residents' Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Learning and Stereotypes Following Sonography Student-Led Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training.

Authors:  Christopher J Smith; Tabatha Matthias; Elizabeth Beam; Kathryn Wampler; Lea Pounds; Devin Nickol; Ronald J Shope; Kristy Carlson; Kimberly Michael
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Professional Stereotypes of Interprofessional Education Naive Pharmacy and Nursing Students.

Authors:  Maria Miller Thurston; Melissa M Chesson; Elaine C Harris; Gina J Ryan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Evaluating Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Collaboration and Education Among Health Professional Learners.

Authors:  Lisa W Christian; Zoha Hassan; Andrew Shure; Kush Joshi; Elaine Lillie; Kevin Fung
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-02-18

4.  The basis of clinical tribalism, hierarchy and stereotyping: a laboratory-controlled teamwork experiment.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Robyn Clay-Williams; Elia Vecellio; Danielle Marks; Tamara Hooper; Mary Westbrook; Johanna Westbrook; Brette Blakely; Kristiana Ludlow
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Interprofessional Collaboration: The Experience of Nursing and Medical Students' Interprofessional Education.

Authors:  Dawn Prentice; Joyce Engel; Karyn Taplay; Karl Stobbe
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2015-01-21

6.  The Association of Readiness for Interprofessional Learning with empathy, motivation and professional identity development in medical students.

Authors:  Cora L F Visser; Janneke A Wilschut; Ulviye Isik; Stéphanie M E van der Burgt; Gerda Croiset; Rashmi A Kusurkar
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  "I didn't realise they had such a key role." Impact of medical education curriculum change on medical student interactions with nurses: a qualitative exploratory study of student perceptions.

Authors:  Ray Samuriwo; Elinor Laws; Katie Webb; Alison Bullock
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.853

8.  Effectiveness of interprofessional education by on-field training for medical students, with a pre-post design.

Authors:  Renzo Zanotti; Giada Sartor; Cristina Canova
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  From Introduction to Integration: Providing Community-Engaged Structure for Interprofessional Education.

Authors:  Daniel P Griffin; Marie C Matte; John M Clements; Elizabeth A Palmer; Laurie A Bahlke; Jessica J Gardon Rose; Lisa A Salvati
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2016-10-27

10.  Defining and understanding the relationship between professional identity and interprofessional responsibility: implications for educating health and social care students.

Authors:  Viktoria C T Joynes
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.