Literature DB >> 16608054

Current practice in conventional and digital intraoral radiography: problems and solutions.

A W Fuhrmann1.   

Abstract

In summary, it can be said for digital radiography that digital exposures can be taken just as well as dental film exposures. The problems found when using holders for the paralleling technique are similar in conventional and digital radiography. Good intraoral x-ray images can be produced as a rule with practice, good will and a skilful hand. The bisected angle technique should no longer be used, as this no longer corresponds to the state of the art and of dental medicine. It is therefore important that all intraoral dental exposures are taken with corresponding holders and the paralleling technique. Thus, the bite wing and measuring exposures are no longer taken with the finger or other aids, but suitable holders are used. However, being able to place the film, the storage phosphor or the sensor in the oral cavity correctly is just as important as the choice of exposure technique. Theoretical knowledge and practical skill are therefore closely related.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16608054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Dent        ISSN: 1463-4201            Impact factor:   1.883


  2 in total

1.  A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study.

Authors:  L A Parrott; S Y Ng
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Effect of changing the kilovoltage peak on radiographic caries assessment in digital and conventional radiography.

Authors:  Mohamed Khalifa Zayet; Yara Rabee Helaly; Salma Belal Eiid
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-09-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.