BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of Angle Class III malocclusion is relatively high in Taiwan. For children who suffer from maxillary retrognathia, face mask therapy is a promising treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in midfacial configuration after face mask therapy in skeletal Class III growing patients by morphometric analysis techniques. METHODS: Thirty children who had been treated with face masks were compared with a group of 30 gender-matched, age-matched, observation period-matched, and craniofacial configuration-matched subjects with untreated Class III malocclusions. Average geometries, scaled to an equivalent size, were generated by means of Procrustes analysis. Graphical analysis, utilizing thin-plate spline analysis and strain tensor methods, was performed for localization of differences in shape and size changes. Maximum and minimum principal extensions were drawn to express the directions of shape change. RESULTS: Maxillary protraction-induced changes resulted from a combination of both orthopedic and dental effects. A significant increase in size (7.7% to 9.9%) was noted at the supero-anterior region of the midfacial configuration (rhinion-orbitale-midpalatal point-anterior nasal spine) when subjected to an extraoral traction force; 7.7% to 12.1% of increase in size and 14.4% to 33.4% of change in shape were found at the anterior portion of the maxillary alveolar bone. The directions and amount of principal strain tensors could express the magnitudes and directions of morphological changes within the midfacial complex in an efficient way. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that morphometric analysis techniques can be used to evaluate the changes in midfacial configuration after face mask therapy and can provide a valuable supplement for conventional cephalometric analysis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The prevalence of Angle Class III malocclusion is relatively high in Taiwan. For children who suffer from maxillary retrognathia, face mask therapy is a promising treatment modality. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in midfacial configuration after face mask therapy in skeletal Class III growing patients by morphometric analysis techniques. METHODS: Thirty children who had been treated with face masks were compared with a group of 30 gender-matched, age-matched, observation period-matched, and craniofacial configuration-matched subjects with untreated Class III malocclusions. Average geometries, scaled to an equivalent size, were generated by means of Procrustes analysis. Graphical analysis, utilizing thin-plate spline analysis and strain tensor methods, was performed for localization of differences in shape and size changes. Maximum and minimum principal extensions were drawn to express the directions of shape change. RESULTS: Maxillary protraction-induced changes resulted from a combination of both orthopedic and dental effects. A significant increase in size (7.7% to 9.9%) was noted at the supero-anterior region of the midfacial configuration (rhinion-orbitale-midpalatal point-anterior nasal spine) when subjected to an extraoral traction force; 7.7% to 12.1% of increase in size and 14.4% to 33.4% of change in shape were found at the anterior portion of the maxillary alveolar bone. The directions and amount of principal strain tensors could express the magnitudes and directions of morphological changes within the midfacial complex in an efficient way. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that morphometric analysis techniques can be used to evaluate the changes in midfacial configuration after face mask therapy and can provide a valuable supplement for conventional cephalometric analysis.