Literature DB >> 16606745

Optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs for different environments with genotype by environment interaction.

H A Mulder1, R F Veerkamp, B J Ducro, J A M van Arendonk, P Bijma.   

Abstract

Dairy cattle breeding organizations tend to sell semen to breeders operating in different environments and genotype x environment interaction may play a role. The objective of this study was to investigate optimization of dairy cattle breeding programs for 2 environments with genotype x environment interaction. Breeding strategies differed in 1) including 1 or 2 environments in the breeding goal, 2) running either 1 or 2 breeding programs, and 3) progeny testing bulls in 1 or 2 environments. Breeding strategies were evaluated on average genetic gain of both environments, which was predicted by using a pseudo-BLUP selection index model. When both environments were equally important and the genetic correlation was higher than 0.61, the highest average genetic gain was achieved with a single breeding program with progeny-testing all bulls in both environments. When the genetic correlation was lower than 0.61, it was optimal to have 2 environment-specific breeding programs progeny-testing an equal number of bulls in their own environment only. Breeding strategies differed by 2 to 12% in average genetic gain, when the genetic correlation ranged between 0.50 and 1.00. Ranking of breeding strategies, based on the highest average genetic gain, was relatively insensitive to heritability, number of progeny per bull, and the relative importance of both environments, but was very sensitive to selection intensity. With more intense selection, running 2 environment-specific breeding programs was optimal for genetic correlations up to 0.70-0.80, but this strategy was less appropriate for situations where 1 of the 2 environments had a relative importance less than 10 to 20%. Results of this study can be used as guidelines to optimize breeding programs when breeding dairy cattle for different parts of the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16606745     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72242-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  19 in total

1.  Genetic evaluation of breeding strategies for improvement of dairy cattle in Kenya.

Authors:  Tobias O Okeno; Isaac S Kosgey; Alexander K Kahi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Quantifying the health challenges in an Australian piggery using medication records for the definition of disease resilience1.

Authors:  Sarita Z Y Guy; Li Li; Peter C Thomson; Susanne Hermesch
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Genotype × prenatal and post-weaning nutritional environment interaction in a composite beef cattle breed using reaction norms and a multi-trait model.

Authors:  El Hamidi Hay; Andy Roberts
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Reaction norm model to describe environmental sensitivity across first lactation in dairy cattle under tropical conditions.

Authors:  Annaiza Braga Bignardi; Lenira El Faro; Rodrigo Junqueira Pereira; Denise Rocha Ayres; Paulo Fernando Machado; Lucia Galvão de Albuquerque; Mário Luiz Santana
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Little genetic variability in resilience among cattle exists for a range of performance traits across herds in Ireland differing in Fasciola hepatica prevalence.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; David A Graham; Michael L Doherty; Astrid Blom; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Genetic (co)variance of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) body weight and its uniformity across production environments.

Authors:  Panya Sae-Lim; Antti Kause; Matti Janhunen; Harri Vehviläinen; Heikki Koskinen; Bjarne Gjerde; Marie Lillehammer; Han A Mulder
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Does selection in a challenging environment produce Nile tilapia genotypes that can thrive in a range of production systems?

Authors:  Ngo Phu Thoa; Nguyen Huu Ninh; Wayne Knibb; Nguyen Hong Nguyen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Genomic Selection Improves Response to Selection in Resilience by Exploiting Genotype by Environment Interactions.

Authors:  Han A Mulder
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Identifying environmental variables explaining genotype-by-environment interaction for body weight of rainbow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss): reaction norm and factor analytic models.

Authors:  Panya Sae-Lim; Hans Komen; Antti Kause; Han A Mulder
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Selection of performance-tested young bulls and indirect responses in commercial beef cattle herds on pasture and in feedlots.

Authors:  Fernanda S S Raidan; Dalinne C C Santos; Mariana M Moraes; Andresa E M Araújo; Henrique T Ventura; José A G Bergmann; Eduardo M Turra; Fabio L B Toral
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.