INTRODUCTION: Biatrial pacing is expected to have preventive effects on atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We evaluated atrial regional wall motion by strain Doppler imaging (SDI) in 6 patients (62.5 +/- 11.3 [SD] years), who suffered from atrial fibrillation, with an implanted biatrial pacemaker. SDI was performed and atrial regional wall motion was estimated during biatrial (BiA) and right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the interval from the pacing spike to the peak strain of the atrium in the lateral right atrium (LRA) between BiA and RAA pacing. However, there was a significant difference in the septal atrium (SA) between BiA and RAA pacing (225.0 +/- 19.9 vs 267.2 +/- 15.7 ms, P < 0.0001) and in the lateral left atrium (LLA) between BiA and RAA pacing (216.7 +/- 21.6 vs 275.0 +/- 16.2 ms, P < 0.0001). There were significant differences in the time difference of peak strain between BiA and RAA pacing in each atrial segment (LRA-AS: 2.2 +/- 5.9 vs 45.0 +/- 11.9 ms, P = 0.0016, SA-LLA: -8.3 +/- 5.5 vs 7.8 +/- 2.7 ms, P < 0.0011, LRA-LLA: -6.1 +/- 3.9 vs 52.8 +/- 13.2 ms, P = 0.0002). There was no significant difference in the interval from the pacing spike to the inflection point of atrial strain (S-I) of LRA. However, there were significant differences in S-I of SA (83.9 +/- 24.1 vs 129.9 +/- 30.6 ms, P = 0.0086) and LLA (102.2 +/- 37.9 vs 166.1 +/- 13.4 ms, P = 0.0028). CONCLUSION: BiA pacing improved the synchronicity of regional wall motion of both atrium.
INTRODUCTION: Biatrial pacing is expected to have preventive effects on atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We evaluated atrial regional wall motion by strain Doppler imaging (SDI) in 6 patients (62.5 +/- 11.3 [SD] years), who suffered from atrial fibrillation, with an implanted biatrial pacemaker. SDI was performed and atrial regional wall motion was estimated during biatrial (BiA) and right atrial appendage (RAA) pacing. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the interval from the pacing spike to the peak strain of the atrium in the lateral right atrium (LRA) between BiA and RAA pacing. However, there was a significant difference in the septal atrium (SA) between BiA and RAA pacing (225.0 +/- 19.9 vs 267.2 +/- 15.7 ms, P < 0.0001) and in the lateral left atrium (LLA) between BiA and RAA pacing (216.7 +/- 21.6 vs 275.0 +/- 16.2 ms, P < 0.0001). There were significant differences in the time difference of peak strain between BiA and RAA pacing in each atrial segment (LRA-AS: 2.2 +/- 5.9 vs 45.0 +/- 11.9 ms, P = 0.0016, SA-LLA: -8.3 +/- 5.5 vs 7.8 +/- 2.7 ms, P < 0.0011, LRA-LLA: -6.1 +/- 3.9 vs 52.8 +/- 13.2 ms, P = 0.0002). There was no significant difference in the interval from the pacing spike to the inflection point of atrial strain (S-I) of LRA. However, there were significant differences in S-I of SA (83.9 +/- 24.1 vs 129.9 +/- 30.6 ms, P = 0.0086) and LLA (102.2 +/- 37.9 vs 166.1 +/- 13.4 ms, P = 0.0028). CONCLUSION: BiA pacing improved the synchronicity of regional wall motion of both atrium.
Authors: Andrzej Rubaj; Piotr Rucinski; Andrzej Kutarski; Alicja Dabrowska-Kugacka; Krzysztof Oleszczak; Barbara Zimon; Michal Trojnar; Tomasz Zapolski; Jakub Drozd; Adam Tarkowski; Andrzej Wysokinski Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 1.900