Literature DB >> 16605222

Exploring strategies for reducing hospital errors.

Kathleen L McFadden1, Gregory N Stock, Charles R Gowen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore current strategies for reducing errors at U.S. hospitals. Reports by the Institute of Medicine highlight concerns about the staggering number of medical errors that occur in the U.S. healthcare system. These reports have exerted considerable pressure on hospitals to establish programs that reduce errors and improve patient safety. A previous research study identifies seven critical strategies for reducing hospital errors based on a case study of four Chicago-area hospitals. These strategies include (1) partnership with stakeholders, (2) reporting errors free of blame, (3) open discussion of errors, (4) cultural shift, (5) education and training, (6) statistical analysis of data, and (7) system redesign. This article reports the results of our nationwide survey of 525 hospitals. We examined the perceptions of healthcare quality directors about the importance of these seven patient safety strategies, the factors that act as barriers, the level of adoption of these strategies, and the benefits resulting from implementation of these strategies. Our results indicate that a considerable gap exists between current hospital practices and the perceived importance of various approaches to improving patient safety. Results of our regression analysis reveal that internal organizational barriers are associated with a larger gap between perceived importance and actual implementation. Moreover, the regression analysis also reveals that smaller gaps are associated with better error outcomes such as reduction in the frequency and severity of errors. The findings provide specific directions for enhancing patient safety programs at hospitals in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16605222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Manag        ISSN: 1096-9012


  2 in total

1.  A balanced scorecard approach in assessing IT value in healthcare sector: an empirical examination.

Authors:  Ing-Long Wu; Yi-Zu Kuo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Staff's perception of abuse in healthcare: a Swedish qualitative study.

Authors:  Katarina Swahnberg; Barbro Wijma
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.