Literature DB >> 16605100

Patients with gastrointestinal complains due to enteric parasites, with reference to Entamoeba histolytica/dispar as dected by ELISA E. histolytica adhesion in stool.

Mohammad A El-Kadi1, Ahmad O Dorrah, Nahla M Shoukry.   

Abstract

A total of 210 patients with gastrointestinal troubles, of both sex and a mean age of 32 +/- 6.1 years, selected from the outpatient's clinics of Al-Azhar University Hospitals. 115 (54.76%) had dysentery, 95 (45.23%) did not have dysentery, 15 (14%) suffered flatulence, 20 (9.52%) had epi-gastric pain, 19 (9.05%) had vague abdominal pain, 5 vomiting (5.2%) and 10 (4.9%) had fever. Two symptoms were in 29 (13.81%) patients and three symptoms in 12 (5.71%). Of the 210 patients, 20 (9.9%) had helminthes infection, 121 (57.6%) had intestinal protozoa and 69 (32.9%) had no parasitic infection. Of these parasite-free patients, 16 had Shigella sp. and nine had Campylobacter sp. Of the patients with intestinal protozoa, 34 (16.2%) had E. histolytica/dispar by stool examination of stained smears. By using ELISA for detection of E. histolytica adhesion in stool samples of 115 with diarrhea only 18 had true E. histolytica infection and of 3 without diarrhea only one had E. histolytica infection. Mean-while, ELISA did not cross-reacted E. coli, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium parvum, Endolimax nana or Blastocystis hominis. So, ELISA for detection of E. histolytica adhesion in stool samples was more specific than microscopy and safe direction to the E. histolytica treatment. Apart from intestinal protozoan and bacteria, helminthes were seen in stool analysis. These were Schistosoma mansoni (0.95%), Capillaria sp. (0.95%), Enterobius vermicularis (1.90%) macroscopically, Hymenolepis nana (4.3%) and Ascaris lumbricoides (1.43%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16605100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Egypt Soc Parasitol        ISSN: 1110-0583


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of microscopic and immunoassay examination in the diagnosis of intestinal protozoa of humans in Mansoura, Egypt.

Authors:  Shaadi F Elswaifi; James R Palmieri; Nora El-Tantawy; Mona El-Hussiny; Tarek Besheer; Ekbal Abohashem
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2014-08-31

2.  Simultaneous detection of Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, Giardia duodenalis and cryptosporidia by immunochromatographic assay in stool samples from patients living in the Greater Cairo Region, Egypt.

Authors:  Dagmar M Banisch; Ayman El-Badry; Jorge V Klinnert; Ralf Ignatius; Nadia El-Dib
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Molecular epidemiology of amebiasis.

Authors:  Ibne Karim M Ali; C Graham Clark; William A Petri
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Use of multiplex real-time PCR for detection of common diarrhea causing protozoan parasites in Egypt.

Authors:  John T Nazeer; Khalifa El Sayed Khalifa; Heidrun von Thien; Mahmoud Mohamed El-Sibaei; Magda Youssef Abdel-Hamid; Ranya Ayman Samir Tawfik; Egbert Tannich
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Intestinal parasites among humans and their livestock animals in a rural community in Gharbia governorate, Egypt.

Authors:  Amel Youssef Shehab; Amal Farahat Allam; Hoda Fahmy Farag; Heba Elhadad; Shimaa Fawzy El Kotb; Hend Aly El-Taweel
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2020-10-06

Review 6.  Review of parasitic zoonoses in egypt.

Authors:  Ahmed I Youssef; Shoji Uga
Journal:  Trop Med Health       Date:  2014-02-11

7.  Zoonotic enteric parasites transmitted from dogs in Egypt with special concern to Toxocara canis infection.

Authors:  Maysa A I Awadallah; Lobna M A Salem
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2015-08-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.