Literature DB >> 16604562

Sexual dimorphism in digit length ratios in two lizard species.

Diego Rubolini1, Fabio Pupin, Roberto Sacchi, Augusto Gentilli, Marco A L Zuffi, Paolo Galeotti, Nicola Saino.   

Abstract

Sexual dimorphism in digit length ratios has been reported for humans, a few other mammals, and two bird species. This dimorphism is thought to arise via an interaction between the prenatal exposure of the embryo to sex hormones and the Hox genes, which are highly conserved among vertebrates and control the development of both the appendices, including fingers and toes, and the urogenital system. In this study, we report on sexual dimorphism in 2D:3D, 2D:4D, and 3D:4D contralateral ratios of the forelimbs in two species of oviparous lizards, the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) and the tree skink (Mabuya planifrons), as measured on museum specimens. We found that male P. muralis had a larger 2D:4D ratio on both sides and larger 2D:3D ratio on the left side than females, whereas in M. planifrons, males had lower 2D:3D ratios than females on the left side. The two species show opposite patterns of sexual dimorphism in body size, males being larger than females in P. muralis, and the reverse in M. planifrons, suggesting that interspecific variation of sex differences in digit ratios could be associated with sex-specific growth trajectories. There was a limited evidence for directional asymmetry in digit ratios. Therefore, our findings provide the first evidence that digit ratios are sexually dimorphic in any reptile species and are consistent with the idea that the genetic link between limb development and the urogenital system had been established with the evolution of the earliest terrestrial tetrapods. Importantly, many lizard species with genetic sex determination, including the ones we studied, are oviparous and may represent valuable animal models for experimental tests of the association between prenatal exposure to androgens or estrogens and digit ratios. 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16604562     DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol        ISSN: 1552-4884


  10 in total

1.  A polymorphism in the oestrogen receptor gene explains covariance between digit ratio and mating behaviour.

Authors:  Wolfgang Forstmeier; Jakob C Mueller; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Avian hind-limb digit length ratios measured from radiographs are sexually dimorphic.

Authors:  Barbara Leoni; Diego Rubolini; Maria Romano; Mauro di Giancamillo; Nicola Saino
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Increased egg estradiol concentration feminizes digit ratios of male pheasants (Phasianus colchicus).

Authors:  N Saino; D Rubolini; M Romano; G Boncoraglio
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-11-30

4.  Side-specific effect of yolk testosterone elevation on second-to-fourth digit ratio in a wild passerine.

Authors:  Gergely Nagy; György Blázi; Gergely Hegyi; János Török
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-01-05

5.  Sex of incubation neighbours influences hatchling sexual phenotypes in an oviparous lizard.

Authors:  Florentino Braña
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Digit ratios have poor indicator value in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Suvi Ruuskanen; Samuli Helle; Markus Ahola; Freya Adamczyck; Erich Möstl; Toni Laaksonen
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Digit ratio, color polymorphism and egg testosterone in the Australian painted dragon.

Authors:  Michael Tobler; Mo Healey; Mats Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the digit ratio 2D:4D--relationships with body size and microhabitat use in iguanian lizards.

Authors:  Camilla M Gomes; Tiana Kohlsdorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Digit ratio (2Dratio4D) differences between 20 strains of inbred mice.

Authors:  Reginia H Y Yan; Mark Bunning; Douglas Wahlsten; Peter L Hurd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Selective breeding for a behavioral trait changes digit ratio.

Authors:  Reginia H Y Yan; Jessica L Malisch; Robert M Hannon; Peter L Hurd; Theodore Garland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.