PURPOSE: Previous studies suggest that radiolabelled amino acids could be superior to FDG in differentiating tumour and inflammation. Therefore the aim of this study was to investigate the uptake of FET and MET in human tumour and inflammatory cells and to investigate their uptake kinetics. METHODS: For uptake studies, cells were incubated with 370 kBq FET or 3.7 kBq MET for 15 min. Kinetic studies were performed at variable concentrations of FET and MET. Competitive inhibition studies were done with BCH, MeAIB and L: -serine. RESULTS: All inflammatory cells incorporated more MET than the tumour cells. The uptake of FET, in contrast, was significantly lower in all inflammatory cells than in the tumour cells. In tumour cells the uptake of MET was about five times the uptake of FET. The competitive inhibitors reduced uptake of both tracers to 20-40% in tumour cells and to 70% in inflammatory cells. Kinetic studies showed that MET and FET transport was saturable in all cells except macrophages and followed a Michaelis-Menten kinetic. Highest capacity (V (max)) and affinity (K (m)) for the uptake of MET was observed in granulocytes. Capacity and affinity for FET uptake were highest in the DHL-4 cells. CONCLUSION: In contrast to MET, FET accumulated to a significantly greater extent in tumour cells than in inflammatory cells. The marked differences between tumour and inflammatory cells concerning FET and MET uptake suggest that FET and MET are substrates of different subtypes of the L system.
PURPOSE: Previous studies suggest that radiolabelled amino acids could be superior to FDG in differentiating tumour and inflammation. Therefore the aim of this study was to investigate the uptake of FET and MET in humantumour and inflammatory cells and to investigate their uptake kinetics. METHODS: For uptake studies, cells were incubated with 370 kBq FET or 3.7 kBq MET for 15 min. Kinetic studies were performed at variable concentrations of FET and MET. Competitive inhibition studies were done with BCH, MeAIB and L: -serine. RESULTS: All inflammatory cells incorporated more MET than the tumour cells. The uptake of FET, in contrast, was significantly lower in all inflammatory cells than in the tumour cells. In tumour cells the uptake of MET was about five times the uptake of FET. The competitive inhibitors reduced uptake of both tracers to 20-40% in tumour cells and to 70% in inflammatory cells. Kinetic studies showed that MET and FET transport was saturable in all cells except macrophages and followed a Michaelis-Menten kinetic. Highest capacity (V (max)) and affinity (K (m)) for the uptake of MET was observed in granulocytes. Capacity and affinity for FET uptake were highest in the DHL-4 cells. CONCLUSION: In contrast to MET, FET accumulated to a significantly greater extent in tumour cells than in inflammatory cells. The marked differences between tumour and inflammatory cells concerning FET and MET uptake suggest that FET and MET are substrates of different subtypes of the L system.
Authors: K Tomiyoshi; T Inoue; T Higuchi; K Ahmed; M Sarwar; S Alyafei; H Zhang; K Matsubara; K Endo; D Yang Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Karl J Langen; Michael Jarosch; Kurt Hamacher; Heinz Mühlensiepen; Friedrich Weber; Frank Floeth; Dirk Pauleit; Hans Herzog; Heinz H Coenen Journal: Nucl Med Biol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Michail Plotkin; C Blechschmidt; G Auf; F Nyuyki; L Geworski; T Denecke; W Brenner; F Stockhammer Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andor W J M Glaudemans; Roelien H Enting; Mart A A M Heesters; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Ronald W J van Rheenen; Annemiek M E Walenkamp; Riemer H J A Slart Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Martin Misch; Andreas Guggemos; Pablo Hernáiz Driever; Arend Koch; Frederik Grosse; Ingo G Steffen; Michail Plotkin; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Gabriele Pöpperl; Friedrich W Kreth; Jan H Mehrkens; Jochen Herms; Klaus Seelos; Walter Koch; Franz J Gildehaus; Hans A Kretzschmar; Jörg C Tonn; Klaus Tatsch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Gérard Moulin-Romsée; Eduard D'Hondt; Tjibbe de Groot; Jan Goffin; Raf Sciot; Luc Mortelmans; Johan Menten; Guy Bormans; Koen Van Laere Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-01 Impact factor: 9.236