PURPOSE: Cervical lymph node status is the most important pathological determinant of prognosis and decision making in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to demonstrate that lymphoscintigraphy (LS) can supply a complete map of the lymphatic drainage before surgery, allowing planning of the type of intervention and serving to guide lymphadenectomy. METHODS: The study population comprised 14 patients with T2-4 SCCs of the tongue and clinically negative lymph nodes in the neck (cN0) who were scheduled to undergo tumour resection and selective level I-IV neck dissection extended to level V. LS was performed in all patients following the injection of (99m)Tc-colloidal sulphide in three aliquots around the primary lesion. Dynamic, static and tomographic images of the head and neck were acquired. The operative specimens were subjected to lymphoscintigraphic evaluation. Preoperative and postoperative imaging results were compared with the pathological findings. All nodes were examined using haematoxylin-eosin staining. RESULTS: Preoperative LS was successful in all patients. Preferential pathways of lymphatic drainage were identified: level II of the neck was the most common lymphatic drainage pattern, followed by levels IV and III. Contralateral drainage occurred in 11 patients and in two of them metastatic nodes were found on the contralateral side. Metastases were observed only in radioactive lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: LS is able to supply a complete map of the lymphatic drainage before surgery, making it possible to tailor selective neck dissection to each individual patient based on the results of preoperative mapping, thereby sparing healthy lymphatic tissue and reducing surgery-related morbidity.
PURPOSE: Cervical lymph node status is the most important pathological determinant of prognosis and decision making in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to demonstrate that lymphoscintigraphy (LS) can supply a complete map of the lymphatic drainage before surgery, allowing planning of the type of intervention and serving to guide lymphadenectomy. METHODS: The study population comprised 14 patients with T2-4 SCCs of the tongue and clinically negative lymph nodes in the neck (cN0) who were scheduled to undergo tumour resection and selective level I-IV neck dissection extended to level V. LS was performed in all patients following the injection of (99m)Tc-colloidal sulphide in three aliquots around the primary lesion. Dynamic, static and tomographic images of the head and neck were acquired. The operative specimens were subjected to lymphoscintigraphic evaluation. Preoperative and postoperative imaging results were compared with the pathological findings. All nodes were examined using haematoxylin-eosin staining. RESULTS: Preoperative LS was successful in all patients. Preferential pathways of lymphatic drainage were identified: level II of the neck was the most common lymphatic drainage pattern, followed by levels IV and III. Contralateral drainage occurred in 11 patients and in two of them metastatic nodes were found on the contralateral side. Metastases were observed only in radioactive lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: LS is able to supply a complete map of the lymphatic drainage before surgery, making it possible to tailor selective neck dissection to each individual patient based on the results of preoperative mapping, thereby sparing healthy lymphatic tissue and reducing surgery-related morbidity.
Authors: K Thomas Robbins; Garry Clayman; Paul A Levine; Jesus Medina; Roy Sessions; Ashok Shaha; Peter Som; Gregory T Wolf Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2002-07
Authors: Francisco J Civantos; Carmen Gomez; Carlos Duque; Felipe Pedroso; William Jarrard Goodwin; Donald T Weed; David Arnold; Fred Moffat Journal: Head Neck Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Gary L Ross; David S Soutar; D Gordon MacDonald; Taimur Shoaib; Ivan Camilleri; Andrew G Roberton; Jens A Sorensen; Jorn Thomsen; Peter Grupe; Julio Alvarez; L Barbier; J Santamaria; Tito Poli; Olindo Massarelli; Enrico Sesenna; Adorján F Kovács; Frank Grünwald; Luigi Barzan; Sandro Sulfaro; Franco Alberti Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2004-06-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Christina Bluemel; Domenico Rubello; Patrick M Colletti; Remco de Bree; Ken Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: L Calabrese; R Bruschini; M Ansarin; G Giugliano; C De Cicco; F Ionna; G Paganelli; F Maffini; J A Werner; D Soutar Journal: Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.124
Authors: Giuseppe Trifirò; Laura L Travaini; Francesca Sanvito; Monica Pacifici; Andrew Mallia; Mahila E Ferrari; Andrea Vertua; Angelo Maggioni; Giovanni Paganelli; Mario G Sideri Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: L W T Alkureishi; Z Burak; J A Alvarez; J Ballinger; A Bilde; A J Britten; L Calabrese; C Chiesa; A Chiti; R de Bree; H W Gray; K Hunter; A F Kovacs; M Lassmann; C R Leemans; G Mamelle; M McGurk; J Mortensen; T Poli; T Shoaib; P Sloan; J A Sorensen; S J Stoeckli; J B Thomsen; G Trifiro; J Werner; G L Ross Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lee W T Alkureishi; Zeynep Burak; Julio A Alvarez; James Ballinger; Anders Bilde; Alan J Britten; Luca Calabrese; Carlo Chiesa; Arturo Chiti; Remco de Bree; Harry W Gray; Keith Hunter; Adorjan F Kovacs; Michael Lassmann; C Rene Leemans; Gerard Mamelle; Mark McGurk; Jann Mortensen; Tito Poli; Taimur Shoaib; Philip Sloan; Jens A Sorensen; Sandro J Stoeckli; Jorn B Thomsen; Giusepe Trifiro; Jochen Werner; Gary L Ross Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.236