Literature DB >> 16603888

A new self-diagnostic test for biceps femoris muscle strains.

Bülent Zeren1, Haluk H Oztekin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared a self-performed diagnostic test that we have been using since 1987, with other commonly used clinical tests for biceps femoris muscle-strain injuries.
SETTING: Private practice focusing on sports injuries. PATIENTS: One-hundred forty professional male soccer players (ages 17 to 33 years) with a history and clinical findings of a pulled hamstring muscle (patients with direct trauma were excluded) had an ultrasound-proven grade I or II biceps femoris muscle injury.
INTERVENTIONS: In these ultrasound-positive patients, the "taking off the shoe" test (TOST) was performed by the patient himself on both the affected and unaffected legs; and the physician then performed the resisted range of motion, passive range of motion, and active range of motion tests.
RESULTS: The TOST had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%, and a positive predictive value and an negative predictive value of 100% for biceps femoris injury as found on ultrasound. The other muscle tests had an average sensitivity of 57%, specificity of 100%, accuracy of 79%, and negative predictive value of 70%.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary, nonblinded observational study of the TOST found it to be more reliable than other commonly used clinical tests for hamstring tears. The clinical value of this easy-to-perform test should be evaluated in a prospective fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16603888     DOI: 10.1097/00042752-200603000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  7 in total

1.  Differential diagnosis and management of an older runner with an atypical neurodynamic presentation: a case for clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Jonathan Sylvain; Michael P Reiman
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

2.  The management of bilateral high hamstring tendinopathy with ASTYM® treatment and eccentric exercise: a case report.

Authors:  Joshua R McCormack
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-08

3.  Clinical predictors of time to return to competition following hamstring injuries.

Authors:  Yannick Guillodo; Caroline Here-Dorignac; Bertrand Thoribé; Gwénaelle Madouas; Marc Dauty; Francois Tassery; Alain Saraux
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-11-17

Review 4.  Diagnosis and prognosis of acute hamstring injuries in athletes.

Authors:  Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Nick van Es; Thijs Wieldraaijer; Inger N Sierevelt; Jan Ekstrand; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of common lower extremity muscle injuries in sport - grading the evidence: a statement paper commissioned by the Danish Society of Sports Physical Therapy (DSSF).

Authors:  Lasse Ishøi; Kasper Krommes; Rasmus Skov Husted; Carsten B Juhl; Kristian Thorborg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  The natural history and management of hamstring injuries.

Authors:  Chad Carlson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-06

7.  The Role of Hip Joint Clearance Discrepancy as Other Clinical Predictor of Reinjury and Injury Severity in Hamstring Tears in Elite Athletes.

Authors:  Jesus Seco-Calvo; Martin Palavicini; Vicente Rodríguez-Pérez; Sergio Sánchez-Herráez; Luis Carlos Abecia-Inchaurregui; Juan Mielgo-Ayuso
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.