OBJECTIVES: To directly measure the cervico-vaginal lavage (CVL) and plasma PRO 2000 concentrations achieved by vaginal dosing. DESIGN: A sub-study of a prospective randomized, double-blind phase 1 trial of a candidate vaginal microbicide, PRO 2000 gel. METHODS:Thirty-six sexually abstinent women self-administered 4% PRO 2000 gel, 0.5% PRO 2000gel or placebo gel twice on day 0 and then once daily for a further 12 days. RESULTS: There was no evidence of systemic absorption of PRO 2000. PRO 2000 concentrations in CVL exceeded 25 microg/ml in all women in both the 4 and 0.5% groups at 2 h post-first dose, and in 10 of 12 of the women in the 4% gel group compared with five of 12 of women in the 0.5% group at 12 h post-seventh dose. Single use of both 4 and 0.5% PRO 2000 gels was therefore associated with levels of PRO 2000 in CVL that would be capable of preventing HIV infection in vitro, although the 4% gel gave a greater margin of excess. Levels substantially in excess of the target concentration were present 12 h after repeated dosing in twice as many 4% gel recipients compared with 0.5% gel recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Both PRO 2000 gel strengths provided satisfactory in-vivo HIV inhibitory concentrations. However, our observations show that higher concentrations of PRO 2000 are likely to provide a greater margin of potential efficacy in the context of sexual intercourse provided safety issues are equivalent for differing concentrations of the agent.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To directly measure the cervico-vaginal lavage (CVL) and plasma PRO 2000 concentrations achieved by vaginal dosing. DESIGN: A sub-study of a prospective randomized, double-blind phase 1 trial of a candidate vaginal microbicide, PRO 2000 gel. METHODS: Thirty-six sexually abstinent women self-administered 4% PRO 2000 gel, 0.5% PRO 2000 gel or placebo gel twice on day 0 and then once daily for a further 12 days. RESULTS: There was no evidence of systemic absorption of PRO 2000. PRO 2000 concentrations in CVL exceeded 25 microg/ml in all women in both the 4 and 0.5% groups at 2 h post-first dose, and in 10 of 12 of the women in the 4% gel group compared with five of 12 of women in the 0.5% group at 12 h post-seventh dose. Single use of both 4 and 0.5% PRO 2000 gels was therefore associated with levels of PRO 2000 in CVL that would be capable of preventing HIV infection in vitro, although the 4% gel gave a greater margin of excess. Levels substantially in excess of the target concentration were present 12 h after repeated dosing in twice as many 4% gel recipients compared with 0.5% gel recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Both PRO 2000 gel strengths provided satisfactory in-vivo HIV inhibitory concentrations. However, our observations show that higher concentrations of PRO 2000 are likely to provide a greater margin of potential efficacy in the context of sexual intercourse provided safety issues are equivalent for differing concentrations of the agent.
Authors: Sharon A Abbott; Barbara A Friedland; Avina Sarna; Lauren L Katzen; Ulrike Rawiel; Aylur K Srikrishnan; C S Shalini; Waimar Tun; Christine A Kelly; Suniti Solomon; Barbara S Mensch Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2013-07
Authors: Sheena McCormack; Gita Ramjee; Anatoli Kamali; Helen Rees; Angela M Crook; Mitzy Gafos; Ute Jentsch; Robert Pool; Maureen Chisembele; Saidi Kapiga; Richard Mutemwa; Andrew Vallely; Thesla Palanee; Yuki Sookrajh; Charles J Lacey; Janet Darbyshire; Heiner Grosskurth; Albert Profy; Andrew Nunn; Richard Hayes; Jonathan Weber Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David Tyssen; Scott A Henderson; Adam Johnson; Jasminka Sterjovski; Katie Moore; Jennifer La; Mark Zanin; Secondo Sonza; Peter Karellas; Michael P Giannis; Guy Krippner; Steve Wesselingh; Tom McCarthy; Paul R Gorry; Paul A Ramsland; Richard Cone; Jeremy R A Paull; Gareth R Lewis; Gilda Tachedjian Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rebecca Pellett Madan; Pedro M M Mesquita; Natalia Cheshenko; Bingwen Jing; Vikas Shende; Esmeralda Guzman; Taylor Heald; Marla J Keller; Steven L Regen; Robin J Shattock; Betsy C Herold Journal: J Virol Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Darpun D Sachdev; Bouchra Zerhouni-Layachi; Mila Ortigoza; Albert T Profy; Michael Tuen; Catarina E Hioe; Mary E Klotman Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Pedro M M Mesquita; Sarah S Wilson; Philippe Manlow; Lucia Fischetti; Marla J Keller; Betsy C Herold; Robin J Shattock Journal: J Virol Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Frank Wegmann; George Krashias; Kerstin Lühn; Karoliina Laamanen; Sueli Vieira; Simon A Jeffs; Robin J Shattock; Quentin J Sattentau Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240