Literature DB >> 16603776

Intrarectal administration of lidocaine gel versus plain lubricant gel for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided extensive 10-core prostate biopsy in Hong Kong Chinese population: prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial.

S Y L Leung1, B B W Wong, M C Cheung, K L Ho, F C W Lee, P C Tam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the level of pain experienced by patients during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy using intrarectal 2% lidocaine gel versus plain lubricant gel.
DESIGN: Prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Regional hospital, Hong Kong. PATIENTS: From March 2002 to December 2003, patients who underwent ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy at a Geriatric Urology Centre. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain and discomfort scores measured by horizontal visual analogue scales.
RESULTS: A total of 338 consecutive patients were randomised to lidocaine gel or plain lubricant gel groups. The two groups were statistically similar in demographic and disease characteristics. There were no significant statistical differences in pain or discomfort score in the lidocaine gel and plain lubricant groups--pain score: 1.75 versus 1.79 (P=0.66) on day 0 and 0.21 versus 0.15 (P=0.97) on day 1; discomfort score: 0.79 versus 0.77 (P=0.86) on day 0 and 0.12 versus 0.12 (P=0.76) on day 1. No major complications were recorded in this cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: Transrectal ultrasound-guided trucut biopsy of the prostate can be safely performed with no anaesthesia in Chinese patients. Pain and discomfort are minimal. It was found that 2% lidocaine gel has no statistical therapeutic or analgesic benefit over plain lubricant gel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16603776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hong Kong Med J        ISSN: 1024-2708            Impact factor:   2.227


  3 in total

1.  The effect of heated lidocaine gel on pain reduction during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Joon Se Jung; Hee Nam Moon; Jung Im Kim; Sang Rak Bae; Chang Hee Han; Bong Hee Park
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pu Yan; Xiao-Yan Wang; Wei Huang; Yong Zhang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  What is the most effective local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 47 randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Do Kyung Kim; Joo Yong Lee; Jae Hung Jung; Yoon Soo Hah; Kyo Chul Koo; Kwang Suk Lee; Byung Ha Chung; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.