Literature DB >> 16603427

Increased incidence of hip fractures. A population based-study in Finland.

Eija Lönnroos1, Hannu Kautiainen, Pertti Karppi, Tiina Huusko, Sirpa Hartikainen, Ilkka Kiviranta, Raimo Sulkava.   

Abstract

In Central Finland, the age-specific incidence of hip fractures did not change between the years 1982-1983 and 1992-1993 though the total number of hip fractures increased by 11% due to population aging. The objective of this study was to define the current hip fracture rates and the characteristics of patients with hip fracture. The population at risk consisted of 240,000 persons living in the Central Finland Health Care District. Hip fracture patients were identified by using the hospital discharge register, the operation lists, and the register of the Department of Anesthesiology. Patients' residential status, weight, and height, date and time of hip fracture, place of accident and mechanism and type of fracture were obtained from medical records. A total of 597 patients, 415 (69.5%) women and 182 (30.5%) men, were admitted to the hospital for treatment of an acute hip fracture in 2002-2003. The mean age of the patients was 79 (SD 13) years. Among patients aged > or =50 years (n = 577), 80.8% of the hip fractures had occurred indoors, 97.6% with a low-energetic mechanism, and 22.7% during the nighttime. The ratio of trochanteric to cervical fractures was 2:3. Between 1992-1993 and 2002-2003, the total number of hip fractures increased by 70%, from 351 to 597. The fracture rates per 1000 person-years in the age group > or =55 years were 2.0 and 3.9 in 1992-1993 and 2.8 and 5.6 in 2002-2003 for men and women, respectively. The corresponding age-adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) for men was 1.36 (95% CI: 1.06 to 1.76), P = 0.017, and for women 1.25 (95% CI: 1.07 to 1.47), P = 0.006. Among men, the IRR was highest in the age group 75-84 years, IRR = 1.67 (95% CI: 1.08 to 2.65), while among women, it was highest in the age group > or =85 years, IRR = 1.33 (95% CI: 1.02 to 1.75). The total number of hip fractures almost doubled within 10 years, and the age-adjusted incidence rate increased in both sexes. The accretion of the hip fracture incidence was more than could be explained merely by changes in population size and structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16603427     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  55 in total

1.  Femoral fractures in the extremely elderly.

Authors:  Giulio Guido; Stefano Giannotti; Vanna Bottai; Marco Ghilardi; Maria Giulia Bianchi; Michael James Ceglia
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-05

2.  Discrepancies in national incidence trends for hip fracture: why does Austria have such a high incidence?

Authors:  Eva Mann; Andrea Icks; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 3.  Features of limb fractures: a review of epidemiology from a Japanese perspective.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Surgical procedures in femoral neck fractures in Finland: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2011.

Authors:  Markus T Hongisto; Harri Pihlajamäki; Seppo Niemi; Maria Nuotio; Pekka Kannus; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  An increase in the incidence of hip fractures in Tangshan, China.

Authors:  Fa-Ming Tian; Liu Zhang; Hai-Yong Zhao; Chun-Yu Liang; Nan Zhang; Hui-Ping Song
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Age-adjusted incidence rates of hip fractures between 2006 and 2009 in Rabat, Morocco.

Authors:  A El Maghraoui; A R Ngbanda; N Bensaoud; M Bensaoud; A Rezqi; M A Tazi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Utilization of inpatient care before and after hip fracture: a population-based study.

Authors:  E Lönnroos; H Kautiainen; R Sund; P Karppi; S Hartikainen; I Kiviranta; R Sulkava
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Comparison of hip fracture incidence and trends between Germany and Austria 1995-2004: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Eva Mann; Gabriele Meyer; Burkhart Haastert; Andrea Icks
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Hip fracture epidemiological trends, outcomes, and risk factors, 1970-2009.

Authors:  Ray Marks
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-04-08

10.  The hip fracture incidence curve is shifting to the right.

Authors:  Ulrica Bergström; Håkan Jonsson; Yngve Gustafson; Ulrika Pettersson; Hans Stenlund; Olle Svensson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.