Literature DB >> 16602331

Informed consent in ENT. Patient's judgement about a specific consensus form.

R Albera1, P Argentero, S Bonziglia, M De Andreis, G Preti, F Palonta, A Canale.   

Abstract

The concept of informed consent was first used in the 60's. The meaning of this term is the need of a preliminary and valid consensus that places the doctor in an authorised condition whereby he is able to carry out his work. Notwithstanding the importance and delicacy of this topic and the potentially serious consequences, there is not, as yet, universal behaviour, on the part of doctors, regarding the mode of information and documentation on how the patient be informed. In a previous article, the authors outlined the best approach, on the part of the doctor in regard to the patient, in order to obtain valid informed consent. In particular, the specific information for each disease was proposed and this was not limited only to aspects related to type of treatment and possible risks, but thorough, with regard to adhering to the logical course (case history, objective tests, instrumental diagnosis carried out, etc.) that led the doctor to a certain diagnosis and a description of the proposed treatment possibilities as well as the treatment modalities excluded, with relative reasons. The study was designed in such a way as to define the degree of acceptance that this informative method has on the patients. This was achieved by means of a questionnaire filled in by 254 patients hospitalised in our department, about to undergo surgery. Judgement was substantially positive, in that, > 70% of patients agreed that the information was quite or very good, and 90% considered it sufficient or better. This demonstrates that even those subjects who received little information, were, in fact, satisfied with that given. The patient/doctor relationship was also judged positive. The patients felt that it was important to be kept informed about their condition, regardless of the form (written or spoken). In conclusion, the outcome of the questionnaire demonstrates the appreciation. on the part of the patients, regarding the procedure of information used in seeking consensus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16602331      PMCID: PMC2639904     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


  2 in total

1.  Relationship between ideology and science.

Authors:  R Canestrari
Journal:  Forum (Genova)       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun

2.  [Informed consent. Proposal of a method for ORL].

Authors:  S Bonziglia; R Albera; L Giordano; L Cardarelli; G Cortesina
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.124

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Does written informed consent adequately inform surgical patients? A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Erminia Agozzino; Sharon Borrelli; Mariagrazia Cancellieri; Fabiola Michela Carfora; Teresa Di Lorenzo; Francesco Attena
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 2.  Open partial horizontal laryngectomies: is it time to adopt a modular form of consent for the intervention?

Authors:  L Giordano; D Di Santo; E Crosetti; A Bertolin; G Rizzotto; G Succo; M Bussi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.124

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.