Literature DB >> 16601164

Scientific misconduct. Cleaning up the paper trail.

Jennifer Couzin, Katherine Unger.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16601164     DOI: 10.1126/science.312.5770.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Doubts over head injury studies.

Authors:  Ian Roberts; Richard Smith; Stephen Evans
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-24

2.  Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct.

Authors:  Anne Victoria Neale; Justin Northrup; Rhonda Dailey; Ellen Marks; Judith Abrams
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Retracted science and the retraction index.

Authors:  Ferric C Fang; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks.

Authors:  Charisse R Madlock-Brown; David Eichmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Analysis of citations to biomedical articles affected by scientific misconduct.

Authors:  Anne Victoria Neale; Rhonda K Dailey; Judith Abrams
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines.

Authors:  Elena Pastor-Ramón; Ivan Herrera-Peco; Oskia Agirre; María García-Puente; José María Morán
Journal:  Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ       Date:  2022-05-04

7.  Research misconduct policies of scientific journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Shyamal Peddada; Winnon Brunson
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Propagation of errors in citation networks: a study involving the entire citation network of a widely cited paper published in, and later retracted from, the journal Nature.

Authors:  Paul E van der Vet; Harm Nijveen
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2016-05-03

9.  Towards a Systematic Screening Tool for Quality Assurance and Semiautomatic Fraud Detection for Images in the Life Sciences.

Authors:  Lars Koppers; Holger Wormer; Katja Ickstadt
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 10.  What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"?

Authors:  Chris R Triggle; David J Triggle
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.