Literature DB >> 16600783

An approach for using full thickness skin grafts for complex penile surgeries in children.

Jannah H Thompson1, Paul Zmaj, James M Cummings, George F Steinhardt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Many problems in pediatric urology derive from a paucity of penile skin resulting from prior surgical interventions. While hypospadias surgery is most often responsible for creating this problem, excessive circumcision also can leave a patient with too little skin to cover the penis. To our knowledge we describe the first series of pediatric patients in whom FTSGs were used in a variety of difficult circumstances where penile skin was lacking.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied a cohort of 11 children 2 to 13 years old who underwent urethral repair and adjunctive skin grafting due to circumcision injuries (4 patients), traumatic urethral injury (1) or congenital lymphangiectasis (1), or for congenital hypospadias with previous failed surgery (5). In our patients available penile skin was used to reconstruct the urethra, while full thickness inguinal skin grafts were fashioned to resurface the denuded penis following reconstruction.
RESULTS: All patients underwent successful reconstruction and grafting. There were no intraoperative complications. There was 100% take of the grafts. Average followup was 23 months (range 3 weeks to 8.6 years). One patient had slight chordee at 6 years postoperatively, and 1 had development of a urethrocutaneous fistula at 8.6 years. All patients reported normal caliber urinary streams.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of full thickness inguinal skin grafts to resurface the penis provided patients with an esthetically acceptable result, and where necessary allowed penile skin to be used for urethroplasty. This technique is useful and justifies consideration in appropriately selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16600783     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00931-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

Review 1.  What is the medical evidence on non-therapeutic child circumcision?

Authors:  Matthew Deacon; Gordon Muir
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Failed hypospadias in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Santiago Vallasciani; Gianantonio Manzoni; Waifro Rigamonti; Enrico De Grazia; Marco Castagnetti
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  [Circumcision and orchiopexy: management of complications].

Authors:  M Promm; W H Rösch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  [Free skin grafts as alternatives in reconstructive plastic surgery of the genitalia].

Authors:  F vom Dorp; H Rübben; S Krege
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Tissue transfer techniques in reconstructive urology.

Authors:  Darren J Bryk; Yuka Yamaguchi; Lee C Zhao
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-06-30

6.  A Retrospective Case Series in Fournier's Disease: And Its Emergency Management et Grafting Technique for Penis Coverage.

Authors:  Domenico Tripodi; Antonio Guastafierro; Federica Gagliardi; Maria Ida Amabile; Eleonora Lori; Roberto Cirocchi; Daniele Pironi; Flavio Forte; Claudio Cannistra; Salvatore Sorrenti
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  The role of flaps and grafts in modern hypospadiology.

Authors:  M Chad Wallis; Luis Braga; Antoine Khoury
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-04

8.  Penile Reconstruction with Skin Grafts and Dermal Matrices: Indications and Management.

Authors:  Paloma Triana Junco; Mariela Dore; Vanesa Nuñez Cerezo; Javier Jimenez Gomez; Miriam Miguel Ferrero; Mercedes Díaz González; Pedro Lopez-Pereira; Juan Carlos Lopez-Gutierrez
Journal:  European J Pediatr Surg Rep       Date:  2017-08-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.