Literature DB >> 16600685

Involving users in service planning: a focus group approach.

Lorraine Kelly1, Kay Caldwell, Lynne Henshaw.   

Abstract

This paper outlines the way in which a focus group approach was used to involve service users in the possible reconfiguration of follow-up services for breast cancer patients at a North London hospital. The focus group was used to identify the priority issues for users and the development of an objective questionnaire, to survey all current service users. Within the National Health Service (NHS) the concept of user involvement has been embodied in contemporary health policy, and has become an important constituent of current policy direction. This study was the first stage of a larger stakeholder project that aimed to involve service users and clinicians in developing a new model of breast cancer follow-up service. From the focus group emerged five key themes around breast cancer follow up. They were: The need for reassurance after the diagnosis of cancer. Continuity of care. Privacy and dignity and other elements of the examination technique. Information and the detection of new symptoms. The opportunity to discuss feelings and worries. In this paper, the nature of breast cancer follow-up services is outlined, and the difficulties associated with such services are discussed. The background to user involvement within the United Kingdom is explored, and the strategies that have previously been used are considered. The practical issues involved in using the focus group approach are examined, and the experience of using such an approach is outlined in this study. The involvement of service users as a key stakeholder in the process of planning change, through a participatory research strategy, ensured that their voices were heard alongside those of both hospital and primary care staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16600685     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2005.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1462-3889            Impact factor:   2.398


  5 in total

1.  Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Else Tambuyzer; Guido Pieters; Chantal Van Audenhove
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Consumer participation and organizational development in health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens B Tempfer; Peter Nowak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Draping education to promote patient dignity: canadian physiotherapy student and instructor perceptions.

Authors:  Nicole Wilson; Diana Hopkins-Rosseel; Christopher Lusty; Henry Averns; Wilma Hopman
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  A qualitative study of patient and clinician attitudes regarding surveillance after a resection of pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer.

Authors:  Raymond G Deobald; Eva S W Cheng; Yoo-Joung Ko; Frances C Wright; Paul J Karanicolas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  GP-led melanoma follow-up: views and feelings of patient recipients.

Authors:  Peter Murchie; Elizabeth K Delaney; Neil C Campbell; Philip C Hannaford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 3.603

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.