Literature DB >> 16599424

Clinical and radiographically/neuroimaging documented outcome in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

John K Houten1, Nicholas H Post, Joseph W Dryer, Thomas J Errico.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Although transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is an increasingly popular surgical technique, there are a limited number of studies in which investigators have stratified outcome data with respect to surgical indications or documented radiographically proven and clinical results with respect to disc space height (DSH). The authors conducted a study to evaluate the long-term outcomes after TLIF with respect to surgical indication and radiographic/neuroimaging results.
METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive TLIF-treated patients underwent follow-up investigation for a mean of 37 months. Isthmic spondylolysis was present in eight patients, recurrent disc herniation in 14, and degenerative disc disease (DDD) in 11. The operative technique involved the placement of interbody structural allograft, pedicle screw instrumentation, and morcellized autograft in the anterior interbody space and the contralateral intertransverse gutter. Surgery was performed at L4-5 in 16 patients, L5-S1 in 14, L3-4 in two, and both L4-5 and L5-S1 in one patient. Preoperative symptoms were back pain (in 91% of cases), leg pain (in 94%), sensory loss (in 67%), and motor deficits (in 30%). Postoperatively, back pain was improved in 67% of the patients, unchanged in 27%, and worsened in 7%. Leg pain improved in 80% of patients, was unchanged in 10%, and worsened in 10%. Outcome, as measured using the Prolo Functional and Economic Scales, improved from a score of 4.9 to 7. In patients with spondylolysis and recurrent disc herniation outcomes were better than in those with DDD only. There was no correlation of outcome with symptom duration, patient age, or level of surgery. In an independent review of pre- and late postoperative radiographs no significant differences in lordosis angles, Cobb angles, or DSHs were found. Fusion occurred in all cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The TLIF procedure was associated with good clinical outcomes and a high fusion rate but no change in the DSH. Patients who present with spondylolysis and recurrent herniations experience better outcome than those with degenerative disease alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16599424     DOI: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with direct lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results.

Authors:  Young Seok Lee; Young Baeg Kim; Seung Won Park; Chan Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-12-31

2.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of postoperative spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  Sung Han Kim; Moo-Sung Kang; Dong-Kyu Chin; Keun-Su Kim; Yong-Eun Cho; Sung-Uk Kuh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2014-10-31

3.  Comparison of Clinical Outcome and Radiologic Parameters in Open TLIF Versus MIS-TLIF in Single- or Double-Level Lumbar Surgeries.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Utsab Shrestha
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

4.  Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Alan T Villavicencio; Sigita Burneikiene; Cassandra M Roeca; E Lee Nelson; Alexander Mason
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2010-05-31

5.  Comparison between Instrumented Mini-TLIF and Instrumented Circumferential Fusion in Adult Low-Grade Lytic Spondylolisthesis : Can Mini-TLIF with PPF Replace Circumferential Fusion?

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28

6.  Acute Contralateral Radiculopathy after Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Kyoung-Min Jang; Seung-Won Park; Young-Baeg Kim; Yong-Sook Park; Taek-Kyun Nam; Young-Seok Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30

Review 7.  What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review.

Authors:  Alisa L Dutmer; Remko Soer; André P Wolff; Michiel F Reneman; Maarten H Coppes; Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of segmental spinal fusion in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with spinous process tricortical autograft.

Authors:  Nattawat Witoon; Teera Tangviriyapaiboon
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-04-08

9.  Comparison between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Conventional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Updated Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Xie; Wen-Jian Wu; Yu Liang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  A Biomechanical Comparison of Shape Design and Positioning of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages.

Authors:  Garet C Comer; Anthony Behn; Shashank Ravi; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.