Literature DB >> 16598356

Open aneurysm repair in elderly patients not candidates for endovascular repair (EVAR): Comparison with patients undergoing EVAR or preferential open repair.

George Manis1, Martin Feuerman, George L Hines.   

Abstract

The authors reviewed a 2-year experience with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair to determine if patients who were excluded from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) because of anatomic criteria (Group III) represented a higher risk for subsequent open aneurysm repair than either patients undergoing EVAR (Group II) or those patients who preferentially underwent open repair (Group I). Between January 2001 and December 2003, 107 patients underwent AAA repair. Open repair was recommended in patients <70 years of age and without significant comorbidities (Group I). There were 35 patients in Group I; 72 patients were evaluated for EVAR; 29 patients underwent EVAR (Group II), and 43 were excluded and underwent open repair (Group III). Exclusion criteria were those recommended by the graft manufacturers. Patients in Group I were significantly younger than those in Groups II and III (p < 0.0001). Gender, incidence of diabetes, and hypertension were similar in all groups. Patients in Group III had a greater incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) than those in Groups I and II, trending toward statistical significance (p = 0.06). Aneurysm size in Group II was statistically smaller than in Group I or III. Group III had significantly more complications (25.6% vs 5.7% and 6.9%) than either Group I or II (p < 0.015). Cardiac complications were similar in all groups. Three patients in Group III required prolonged intubation and 3 in Group III developed renal insufficiency. A history of CAD was predictive of complications (21.8% vs 5.8%, p < 0.024), as was inclusion in Group III. There were 2 deaths in this series, both in Group III. Length of stay was significantly less in Group II (4.17 +/-2.36 days) than in Group I (6.57 +/-1.84 days) or Group III (12.30 +/-9.82 days) (p = 0.0001). Open aneurysm repair can be safely performed in younger good-risk patients (Group I) with results equivalent to EVAR (Group II) but with slightly longer length of stay (LOS). In older patients with suitable anatomy EVAR can be performed with minimal morbidity and short LOS. Older patients not suitable for EVAR (Group III) constitute a higher risk group of patients because of increased incidence of CAD and the need for more complex repairs. However, the mortality rate in this group was only 4.6%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16598356     DOI: 10.1177/153857440604000202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg        ISSN: 1538-5744            Impact factor:   1.089


  3 in total

1.  An update on the 'fast-track' abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Dipankar Mukherjee; Tyson E Becker
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2008

2.  Is Conventional Open Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Feasible in Nonagenarians?

Authors:  Kyokun Uehara; Hitoshi Matsuda; Yosuke Inoue; Atsushi Omura; Yoshimasa Seike; Hiroaki Sasaki; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2017-09-25

Review 3.  Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR.

Authors:  Robert Hopkins; James Bowen; Kaitryn Campbell; Gord Blackhouse; Guy De Rose; Teresa Novick; Daria O'Reilly; Ron Goeree; Jean-Eric Tarride
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.