I Paredes1, M Ahmed, C S Foster. 1. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report on the use of immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) in a group of patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) and to compare the outcomes with those of another group of patients with VKH who were treated for prolonged periods with corticosteroids. METHODS: Treatment regimens and their respective outcomes (visual acuity) were compared for the following groups: prolonged steroid with or without delayed addition of IMT (Group 1) and relatively prompt IMT with or without steroid (Group 2). RESULTS: The average duration of follow-up in Group 1 was 28.9 months and in Group 2 23.4 months. In Group 1, visual acuity deteriorated in three of the five patients (60%) and improved in one (20%). The fifth patient showed improvement in visual acuity in one eye, but decreased visual acuity in the other eye. In Group 2, seven of the eight patients showed improvement in their visual acuities (87.5%); visual acuity deteriorated in one patient (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that IMT as first-line therapy for VKH is associated with a superior visual outcome when compared to steroid as monotherapy or with delayed addition of IMT.
PURPOSE: To report on the use of immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) in a group of patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) and to compare the outcomes with those of another group of patients with VKH who were treated for prolonged periods with corticosteroids. METHODS: Treatment regimens and their respective outcomes (visual acuity) were compared for the following groups: prolonged steroid with or without delayed addition of IMT (Group 1) and relatively prompt IMT with or without steroid (Group 2). RESULTS: The average duration of follow-up in Group 1 was 28.9 months and in Group 2 23.4 months. In Group 1, visual acuity deteriorated in three of the five patients (60%) and improved in one (20%). The fifth patient showed improvement in visual acuity in one eye, but decreased visual acuity in the other eye. In Group 2, seven of the eight patients showed improvement in their visual acuities (87.5%); visual acuity deteriorated in one patient (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that IMT as first-line therapy for VKH is associated with a superior visual outcome when compared to steroid as monotherapy or with delayed addition of IMT.
Authors: Massimo Accorinti; Maria Carmela Saturno; Ludovico Iannetti; Priscilla Manni; Davide Mastromarino; Maria Pia Pirraglia Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Elizabeth Shen; Sivakumar R Rathinam; Manohar Babu; Anuradha Kanakath; Radhika Thundikandy; Salena M Lee; Erica N Browne; Travis C Porco; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 5.258