Literature DB >> 16597509

The value of an evidence database for occupational therapists: an international online survey.

Sally Bennett1, Kryss McKenna, Tammy Hoffmann, Leigh Tooth, Annie McCluskey, Jenny Strong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Online evidence databases can provide access to high quality evidence at the point of care, making evidence-based practice more achievable. A discipline-specific online bibliographic database called OTseeker (www.otseeker.com) was designed for use by occupational therapists. The database is free, and contains citations and abstracts of systematic reviews, and critically appraised randomized controlled trials relevant to occupational therapy.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate search practices of database users, their views on its functionality, and the reported impact, if any, on their practice from using OTseeker.
DESIGN: An online survey, placed on the database website for 30 days. SAMPLE: Potential participants were users of OTseeker during a 30-day period. A total of 498 people who had used the database more than once from over 40 countries completed the survey.
RESULTS: Three hundred and nine (62%) participants believed that OTseeker had improved their ability to locate research about the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions, and 92 (19%) agreed that the information in the database had contributed to a change in practice. Those reporting no practice changes agreed that use of OTseeker had improved their knowledge generally (n=189; 38%), confirmed their practice (n=75; 15%), or revealed that there was insufficient research relevant to their search topic (n=92; 19%). Features of the database which helped respondents locate research evidence included: having discipline-specific content, providing critical appraisal ratings for randomized controlled trials, and presenting search results ranked for methodological quality.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the value of a discipline-specific, online database for helping occupational therapists locate high quality research evidence. Information located on databases such as OTseeker can help change or confirm practice, and improve knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16597509     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical information behavior of rehabilitation therapists: a review of the research on occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists.

Authors:  Lorie Andrea Kloda; Joan C Bartlett
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2009-07

2.  Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is properly perceived but its application is still limited in the orthopedic clinical practice: an online survey among the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) members.

Authors:  G Lugano; S Gianola; G Castellini; G Banfi; R Seil; M Denti; Laura de Girolamo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties.

Authors:  Tammy Hoffmann; Chrissy Erueti; Sarah Thorning; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-05-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.