Literature DB >> 16596664

NO removal in continuous BioDeNOx reactors: Fe(II)EDTA2- regeneration, biomass growth, and EDTA degradation.

Peter van der Maas1, Paula van den Brink, Sudarno Utomo, Bram Klapwijk, Piet Lens.   

Abstract

BioDeNOx is a novel technique for NOx removal from industrial flue gases. In principle, BioDeNOx is based on NO absorption into an aqueous Fe(II)EDTA2- solution combined with biological regeneration of that scrubber liquor in a bioreactor. The technical and economical feasibility of the BioDeNOx concept is strongly determined by high rate biological regeneration of the aqueous Fe(II)EDTA2- scrubber liquor and by EDTA degradation. This investigation deals with the Fe(II)EDTA2- regeneration capacity and EDTA degradation in a lab-scale BioDeNOx reactor (10-20 mM Fe(II)EDTA2-, pH 7.2 +/- 0.2, 55 degrees C), treating an artificial flue gas (1.5 m3/h) containing 60-155 ppm NO and 3.5-3.9% O2. The results obtained show a contradiction between the optimal redox state of the aqueous FeEDTA solution for NO absorption and the biological regeneration. A low redox potential (below -150 mV vs. Ag/AgCl) is needed to obtain a maximal NO removal efficiency from the gas phase via Fe(II)EDTA2- absorption. Fe(III)EDTA- reduction was found to be too slow to keep all FeEDTA in the reduced state. Stimulation of Fe(III)EDTA- reduction via periodical sulfide additions (2 mM spikes twice a week for the conditions applied in this study) was found to be necessary to regenerate the Fe(II)EDTA2- scrubber liquor and to achieve stable operation at redox potentials below -150 mV (pH 7.2 +/- 0.2). However, redox potentials of below -200 mV should be avoided since sulfide accumulation is unwanted because it is toxic for NO reduction. Very low values for biomass growth rate and yield, respectively, 0.043/d and 0.009 mg protein per mg ethanol, were observed. This might be due to substrate limitations, that is the electron acceptors NO and presumably polysulfide, or to physiological stress conditions induced by the EDTA rich medium or by radicals formed in the scrubber upon the oxidation of Fe(II)EDTA2- by oxygen present in the flue gas. Radicals possibly also induce EDTA degradation, which occurs at a substantial rate: 2.1 (+/-0.1) mM/d under the conditions investigated. 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16596664     DOI: 10.1002/bit.20859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  4 in total

1.  Fe(III)EDTA and Fe(II)EDTA-NO reduction by a sulfate reducing bacterium in NO and SO₂ scrubbing liquor.

Authors:  Mingxiang Chen; Jiti Zhou; Yu Zhang; Xiaojun Wang; Zhuang Shi; Xiaowei Wang
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  AB569, a nontoxic chemical tandem that kills major human pathogenic bacteria.

Authors:  Cameron T McDaniel; Warunya Panmanee; Geoffrey L Winsor; Erin Gill; Claire Bertelli; Michael J Schurr; Prateek Dongare; Andrew T Paul; Seung-Hyun B Ko; Gee W Lau; Nupur Dasgupta; Amy L Bogue; William E Miller; Joel E Mortensen; David B Haslam; Phillip Dexheimer; Daniel A Muruve; Bruce J Aronow; Malcolm D E Forbes; Marek Danilczuk; Fiona S L Brinkman; Robert E W Hancock; Thomas J Meyer; Daniel J Hassett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Performance and Microbial Community Analysis of an Electrobiofilm Reactor Enhanced by Ferrous-EDTA.

Authors:  Nan Liu; Ying-Ying Li; Du-Juan Ouyang; Chang-Yong Zou; Wei Li; Ji-Hong Zhao; Ji-Xiang Li; Wen-Juan Wang; Ja-Jun Hu
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-07-06

4.  Pathway of FeEDTA transformation and its impact on performance of NOx removal in a chemical absorption-biological reduction integrated process.

Authors:  Wei Li; Jingkai Zhao; Lei Zhang; Yinfeng Xia; Nan Liu; Sujing Li; Shihan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.