Literature DB >> 16596445

Local osmosis and isotonic transport.

R T Mathias1, H Wang.   

Abstract

Osmotically driven water flow, u (cm/s), between two solutions of identical osmolarity, c(o) (300 mM: in mammals), has a theoretical isotonic maximum given by u = j/c(o), where j (moles/cm(2)/s) is the rate of salt transport. In many experimental studies, transport was found to be indistinguishable from isotonic. The purpose of this work is to investigate the conditions for u to approach isotonic. A necessary condition is that the membrane salt/water permeability ratio, epsilon, must be small: typical physiological values are epsilon = 10(-3) to 10(-5), so epsilon is generally small but this is not sufficient to guarantee near-isotonic transport. If we consider the simplest model of two series membranes, which secrete a tear or drop of sweat (i.e., there are no externally-imposed boundary conditions on the secretion), diffusion is negligible and the predicted osmolarities are: basal = c(o), intracellular approximately (1 + epsilon)c(o), secretion approximately (1 + 2epsilon)c(o), and u approximately (1 - 2epsilon)j/c(o). Note that this model is also appropriate when the transported solution is experimentally collected. Thus, in the absence of external boundary conditions, transport is experimentally indistinguishable from isotonic. However, if external boundary conditions set salt concentrations to c(o) on both sides of the epithelium, then fluid transport depends on distributed osmotic gradients in lateral spaces. If lateral spaces are too short and wide, diffusion dominates convection, reduces osmotic gradients and fluid flow is significantly less than isotonic. Moreover, because apical and basolateral membrane water fluxes are linked by the intracellular osmolarity, water flow is maximum when the total water permeability of basolateral membranes equals that of apical membranes. In the context of the renal proximal tubule, data suggest it is transporting at near optimal conditions. Nevertheless, typical physiological values suggest the newly filtered fluid is reabsorbed at a rate u approximately 0.86 j/c(o), so a hypertonic solution is being reabsorbed. The osmolarity of the filtrate c(F) (M) will therefore diminish with distance from the site of filtration (the glomerulus) until the solution being transported is isotonic with the filtrate, u = j/c(F).With this steady-state condition, the distributed model becomes approximately equivalent to two membranes in series. The osmolarities are now: c(F) approximately (1 - 2epsilon)j/c(o), intracellular approximately (1 - epsilon)c(o), lateral spaces approximately c(o), and u approximately (1 + 2epsilon)j/c(o). The change in c(F) is predicted to occur with a length constant of about 0.3 cm. Thus, membrane transport tends to adjust transmembrane osmotic gradients toward epsilonc(o), which induces water flow that is isotonic to within order epsilon. These findings provide a plausible hypothesis on how the proximal tubule or other epithelia appear to transport an isotonic solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16596445      PMCID: PMC1752196          DOI: 10.1007/s00232-005-0817-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Membr Biol        ISSN: 0022-2631            Impact factor:   1.843


  26 in total

Review 1.  Models for coupling of salt and water transport; Proximal tubular reabsorption in Necturus kidney.

Authors:  H Sackin; E L Boulpaep
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  A model system for biological water transport.

Authors:  P F CURRAN; J R MACINTOSH
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1962-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A mathematical model of electrolyte and fluid transport across corneal endothelium.

Authors:  J Fischbarg; F P J Diecke
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Standing-gradient flows driven by active solute transport.

Authors:  L A Segel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Models of coupled salt and water transport across leaky epithelia.

Authors:  A M Weinstein; J L Stephenson
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1981-05-15       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  Luminal hypotonicity: a driving force for fluid absorption from the proximal tubule.

Authors:  R Green; G Giebisch
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1984-02

Review 7.  Water pumps.

Authors:  Donald D F Loo; Ernest M Wright; Thomas Zeuthen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Standing-gradient osmotic flow. A mechanism for coupling of water and solute transport in epithelia.

Authors:  J M Diamond; W H Bossert
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  THE MECHANISM OF ISOTONIC WATER TRANSPORT.

Authors:  J M DIAMOND
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Na, Cl, and water transport by rat ileum in vitro.

Authors:  P F CURRAN
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  21 in total

1.  Feedback Regulation of Intracellular Hydrostatic Pressure in Surface Cells of the Lens.

Authors:  Junyuan Gao; Xiurong Sun; Thomas W White; Nicholas A Delamere; Richard T Mathias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Na+ recirculation and isosmotic transport.

Authors:  E H Larsen; N Møbjerg
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  The effects of age on lens transport.

Authors:  Junyuan Gao; Huan Wang; Xiurong Sun; Kulandaiappan Varadaraj; Leping Li; Thomas W White; Richard T Mathias
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Lens gap junctions in growth, differentiation, and homeostasis.

Authors:  Richard T Mathias; Thomas W White; Xiaohua Gong
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Frequency spectrum of transepithelial potential difference reveals transport-related oscillations.

Authors:  Nicolás Montalbetti; Jorge Fischbarg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  What do aquaporin knockout studies tell us about fluid transport in epithelia?

Authors:  Oliver J Maclaren; James Sneyd; Edmund J Crampin
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  A Bidomain Model for Lens Microcirculation.

Authors:  Yi Zhu; Shixin Xu; Robert S Eisenberg; Huaxiong Huang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  The aquaporin zero puzzle.

Authors:  James E Hall; Richard T Mathias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Fluid and solute transport across the retinal pigment epithelium: a theoretical model.

Authors:  Mariia Dvoriashyna; Alexander J E Foss; Eamonn A Gaffney; Rodolfo Repetto
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Fluid transport phenomena in ocular epithelia.

Authors:  Oscar A Candia; Lawrence J Alvarez
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.