Literature DB >> 16596110

Cardiorespiratory fitness in relation to self-reported physical function in cancer patients after chemotherapy.

L Thorsen1, W Nystad, H Stigum, M Hjermstad, L Oldervoll, E W Martinsen, K Hornslien, S B Strømme, A A Dahl, S D Fosså.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to estimate the association between objective cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and subjective self-reported physical function, taking into account the influence of mental distress. We hypothesized an association between these parameters, since they might be thought to measure parts of the same phenomenon.
METHODS: Approximately 1 month after discontinuation of all primary treatment, 90 cancer patients aged 18-50 years treated with chemotherapy were surveyed. CRF was determined by the Astrand-Ryhming indirect cycle ergometer test, which indicate peak VO2 in mL x kg(-1) x min(-1) (predicted VO2max). Self-reported physical function was assessed by The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The relation between VO2max and self-reported physical function was estimated by multiple linear regression. Mental distress (assessed by The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), age, gender, body mass index (BMI), time from treatment to physical test and diagnoses were included as potential confounders.
RESULTS: There was no association between predicted VO2max and self-reported physical function. Mental distress was negatively associated with self-reported physical function (P<0.001), but is not associated with predicted VO2max.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that predicted VO2max does not reflect self-reported physical function and vice versa in cancer patients after chemotherapy. If information about cardiac and/or pulmonary status is required, direct or indirect measures of VO2max should be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16596110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  3 in total

1.  Physical decline and its implications in the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda O'Neill; Jonathan Moran; Emer M Guinan; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  A pilot study evaluating predictors of postoperative outcomes after major abdominal surgery: Physiological capacity compared with the ASA physical status classification system.

Authors:  C E Hightower; B J Riedel; B W Feig; G S Morris; J E Ensor; V D Woodruff; M D Daley-Norman; X G Sun
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Personality, metabolic rate and aerobic capacity.

Authors:  Antonio Terracciano; Jennifer A Schrack; Angelina R Sutin; Wayne Chan; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.