BACKGROUND: Survivors of disaster with pre-disaster psychological problems are believed to be at risk for presenting post-disaster psychological and physical morbidity. Up till now this statement is based on cross-sectional studies with self-reported data and without pre-disaster measurement. OBJECTIVE: To monitor post-disaster health care utilization and morbidity presented in general practice after a man-made disaster by victims and controls with and without pre-disaster psychological problems. METHODS: A controlled cohort study with pre-disaster (1 year) and post-disaster (two-and-a-half years) data. Victims (N = 2518) of an exploding fireworks depot in a residential area and matched controls (N = 2512), representing patients in 30 general practices, were included. Main outcome measures were utilization measured by GP attendances, and psychological and physical problems registered by the GP using the International Classification of Primary Care. RESULTS: Only victims without pre-disaster psychological problems demonstrated a significant increase in utilization in the first half year post-disaster. Victims with pre-disaster psychological problems did not. Being a victim (OR = 6.13; 95% CI = 4.84-7.77) had a greater effect than pre-disaster psychological problems (OR = 4.96; 95% CI = 3.96-6.21) on presenting post-disaster psychological problems. Pre-disaster psychological problems had more effect (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.79-2.08) than the effect of being a victim (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.18-1.32) on the development of post-disaster physical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Post-disaster increases in utilization and psychological morbidity were observed. Post-disaster psychological problems were more influenced by the disaster, while post-disaster physical symptoms were more influenced by pre-disaster psychological problems. GPs should concentrate on the pre-disaster health history of victims of man-made disasters in their practices.
BACKGROUND: Survivors of disaster with pre-disaster psychological problems are believed to be at risk for presenting post-disaster psychological and physical morbidity. Up till now this statement is based on cross-sectional studies with self-reported data and without pre-disaster measurement. OBJECTIVE: To monitor post-disaster health care utilization and morbidity presented in general practice after a man-made disaster by victims and controls with and without pre-disaster psychological problems. METHODS: A controlled cohort study with pre-disaster (1 year) and post-disaster (two-and-a-half years) data. Victims (N = 2518) of an exploding fireworks depot in a residential area and matched controls (N = 2512), representing patients in 30 general practices, were included. Main outcome measures were utilization measured by GP attendances, and psychological and physical problems registered by the GP using the International Classification of Primary Care. RESULTS: Only victims without pre-disaster psychological problems demonstrated a significant increase in utilization in the first half year post-disaster. Victims with pre-disaster psychological problems did not. Being a victim (OR = 6.13; 95% CI = 4.84-7.77) had a greater effect than pre-disaster psychological problems (OR = 4.96; 95% CI = 3.96-6.21) on presenting post-disaster psychological problems. Pre-disaster psychological problems had more effect (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.79-2.08) than the effect of being a victim (OR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.18-1.32) on the development of post-disaster physical symptoms. CONCLUSION: Post-disaster increases in utilization and psychological morbidity were observed. Post-disaster psychological problems were more influenced by the disaster, while post-disaster physical symptoms were more influenced by pre-disaster psychological problems. GPs should concentrate on the pre-disaster health history of victims of man-made disasters in their practices.
Authors: Marjan van den Akker; Mark G Spigt; Lore De Raeve; Ben van Steenkiste; Job F M Metsemakers; Ernst J van Voorst; Hein de Vries Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-01-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rik J H Soeteman; C Joris Yzermans; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Toine A L M Lagro-Janssen; Wil J H M van den Bosch; Jouke van der Zee Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 2.497