Literature DB >> 16595530

Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.

Thomas J Prihoda1, R Neal Pinckard, C Alex McMahan, Anne Cale Jones.   

Abstract

A standard correction for random guessing on multiple-choice examinations was examined retrospectively in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course for second-year dental students. The correction was a weighting formula for points awarded for correct answers, incorrect answers, and unanswered questions such that the expected value of the increase in test score due to guessing was zero. We compared uncorrected and corrected scores on examinations using a multiple-choice format with scores on examinations composed of short-answer questions. The short-answer format eliminated or at least greatly reduced the potential for guessing the correct answer. Agreement of corrected multiple-choice scores with short-answer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.78) was significantly (p=0.015) higher than agreement of uncorrected multiple-choice scores with short-answer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.71). The higher agreement indicated increased validity for the corrected multiple-choice examination.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16595530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Educ        ISSN: 0022-0337            Impact factor:   2.264


  1 in total

1.  Contemplation on marking scheme for Type X multiple choice questions, and an illustration of a practically applicable scheme.

Authors:  Nazeem Ishrat Siddiqui; Vinayak H Bhavsar; Arnav V Bhavsar; Sukhwant Bose
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.200

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.