Literature DB >> 16595452

Potential biologic therapies for the intervertebral disc.

Christopher Evans1.   

Abstract

Biology offers several strategies for restoring the degenerating disc, including the use of recombinant or natural proteins that increase matrix accumulation and assembly, enhance the number of disc cells, or in other ways lead to restoration of the native healthy disc. Recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-7 (osteogenic protein-1) shows promise in this regard. Other growth factors, as well as cytokine antagonists such as the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, are also good candidates. Because disc degeneration is a chronic, progressive disorder occurring over many years, it is likely that growth factors and other therapeutic proteins will need to be present in the disc for extended periods of time. The intradiscal injection of recombinant or natural proteins is unlikely to fulfill this requirement. In this scenario, the delivery of genes that encode the protein in question may provide a better delivery system. Kang and associates have pioneered this strategy, demonstrating the responsiveness of disc cells to in situ genetic modification. The success of protein and gene therapy requires the presence of an adequate number of responding cells. Disc degeneration is accompanied by a decline in cellularity. Restoring cell numbers could be achieved by either stimulating the division and inhibiting the death of endogenous cells or by introducing new cells into the disc. The latter strategy may be more successful, especially if the endogenous cells of a degenerating disc are unresponsive or otherwise abnormal. When pursuing this strategy, there are several important reasons why it is better to introduce progenitor cells than to attempt to harvest and reintroduce mature disc cells. Progenitor cells of the mesenchymal lineage, available from bone marrow, fat, and other convenient sources, could be useful. However, although the presumption exists that these types of cells can differentiate into disc cells, this has never been demonstrated. One impediment to confirming differentiation into a disc cell is our inability to identify these cells; there are no robust molecular, biochemical, or biologic markers. The serious study of disc-cell biology at this level would be most rewarding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16595452     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  23 in total

1.  The effects of needle puncture injury on microscale shear strain in the intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus.

Authors:  Arthur J Michalek; Mark R Buckley; Lawrence J Bonassar; Itai Cohen; James C Iatridis
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Scaffolding in tissue engineering: general approaches and tissue-specific considerations.

Authors:  B P Chan; K W Leong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Localized Intervertebral Disc Injury Leads to Organ Level Changes in Structure, Cellularity, and Biosynthesis.

Authors:  James C Iatridis; A J Michalek; D Purmessur; C L Korecki
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.321

4.  Prostaglandin E2 and prostaglandin F2α differentially modulate matrix metabolism of human nucleus pulposus cells.

Authors:  Nam V Vo; Gwendolyn A Sowa; James D Kang; Christopher Seidel; Rebecca K Studer
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Clinical experience in cell-based therapeutics: intervention and outcome.

Authors:  Hans Joerg Meisel; Timothy Ganey; William C Hutton; Jeanette Libera; Yvonne Minkus; Olivera Alasevic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Muscone protects vertebral end-plate degeneration by antiinflammatory property.

Authors:  Qian-Qian Liang; Min Zhang; Quan Zhou; Qi Shi; Yong-Jun Wang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Using genes to facilitate the endogenous repair and regeneration of orthopaedic tissues.

Authors:  Christopher Evans
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  In vivo intervertebral disc remodeling: kinetics of mRNA expression in response to a single loading event.

Authors:  Jeffrey J MacLean; Peter J Roughley; Robert D Monsey; Mauro Alini; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Repair, regenerative and supportive therapies of the annulus fibrosus: achievements and challenges.

Authors:  Johannes Leendert Bron; Marco N Helder; Hans-Jorg Meisel; Barend J Van Royen; Theodoor H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Do we need biomarkers for disc degeneration?

Authors:  Helen E Gruber; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.